2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil moisture evaluation over the Argentine Pampas using models, satellite estimations and in-situ measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several types of soil moisture datasets as the model output are used in previous studies (Qin et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2016), such as Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS; Rodell et al, 2004), Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5; Berg et al, 2017;Feng et al, 2017), and various reanalysis data sets (e.g. ERA-Interim and MERRA V2) (Modanesi et al, 2020;Spennemann et al, 2020;Zhou et al, 2020). In GLDAS, Land Surface Models (LSMs) and hydrological models were driven by meteorological forcing to simulate soil moisture of multilayers with different depths (Bi et al, 2016;Yuan and Quiring, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several types of soil moisture datasets as the model output are used in previous studies (Qin et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2016), such as Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS; Rodell et al, 2004), Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5; Berg et al, 2017;Feng et al, 2017), and various reanalysis data sets (e.g. ERA-Interim and MERRA V2) (Modanesi et al, 2020;Spennemann et al, 2020;Zhou et al, 2020). In GLDAS, Land Surface Models (LSMs) and hydrological models were driven by meteorological forcing to simulate soil moisture of multilayers with different depths (Bi et al, 2016;Yuan and Quiring, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model has been proven to have a very good fit with observed data (Spennemann et al ., 2020; Veliz et al ., 2016) and has been used in Argentina for the estimation of soil moisture with different objectives (Pántano et al ., 2017; Pinto et al ., 2017; Penalba et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Argentina, Spennemann et al . (2020) have recently examined different LSMs and satellite estimations of soil moisture, including GLDAS‐Noah (GLDAS version 2.1 [Ek et al ., 2003; Rodell et al ., 2004]), ERA Interim‐TESSEL (van den Hurk et al ., 2000), GDO‐LISFLOOD (de Roo et al ., 2000) and the BHOA bucket model (for its acronym in Spanish: “Balance Hidrológico Operativo para el Agro”; Fernández‐Long et al ., 2012; Fernández‐Long, 2017). These authors found that, in general, the soil moisture estimations are able to represent the main characteristics of the local soil moisture variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Latin America, the "Sistema Integral Regional de Información Satelital (SIRIS)" is an international collaboration among the Inter-American Development Bank and the Space Agencies from Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay [22] to provide satellite products over Latin America, including SMAP SM. However, very few agricultural validation sites in Latin America and the Caribbean have been included for validation [23], [12], [24], primarily, because of the lack of mid-and long-term and/or reliable datasets of in situ SM. Due to the importance of agriculture in the region [25], [26], [27], more long-term datasets describing agricultural regions of Latin America and the Caribbean are needed to improve SM estimates in the region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%