2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil organic carbon and soil erodibility response to various land-use changes in northern Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that plants can affect the soil properties of fissure and non-fissure zones in the FSPS with vegetation restoration, but the variability of each soil erosion indicator with vegetation type is complex. Consistent with previous studies, vegetation restoration positively promoted nutrient accumulation, improved soil structure and aggregate formation, and reduced the difference between fissure and non-fissure zones (Arunrat et al, 2022).…”
Section: Effects Of Vegetation Restoration On Soil Propertiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results showed that plants can affect the soil properties of fissure and non-fissure zones in the FSPS with vegetation restoration, but the variability of each soil erosion indicator with vegetation type is complex. Consistent with previous studies, vegetation restoration positively promoted nutrient accumulation, improved soil structure and aggregate formation, and reduced the difference between fissure and non-fissure zones (Arunrat et al, 2022).…”
Section: Effects Of Vegetation Restoration On Soil Propertiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…There are three widely used approaches for assessing soil erodibility (k-factor), namely, the nomograph (Wischmeier et al, 1971), the K-factor in the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model (Williams et al, 1983), and a formula proposed by Shirazi and Boersma (1984). Among them, the k-factor in the EPIC model is calculated using the OC content and the soil particle distribution (the contents of sand, silt, and clay); this approach is widely used to predict soil erosion and indicate soil degradation (Wu et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2020;Arunrat et al, 2022b;Arunrat et al, 2022c). Therefore, the k-factor in the EPIC model was used in this study, with the following equation:…”
Section: Soil Erodibility Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the present study, three possible effective practices for post-fire land management in the RSC fields are recommended. The first is allowing weed and grass growth before burning to reduce soil heat; the survival of shoots and roots of grasses and weeds can facilitate rapid regrowth, supporting soil recovery (Kirchmann et al, 2013;Arunrat et al, 2022c)…”
Section: Implications For Post-fire Land Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several biological factors influence the processes of soil organic carbon sequestration and decomposition, such as soil depth, temperature sensitivity ( Hyvönen et al, 2007 ; Xu, Luo & Zhou, 2012 ), N deposition ( Law, 2013 ; Schulte-Uebbing, Ros & De Vries, 2022 ), climatic conditions ( Liu, Shao & Wang, 2011 ; Ngaba et al, 2019 ), soil aggregate distribution ( Liu et al, 2018 ; Ngaba, Bol & Hu, 2021 ). Further, soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration significantly decreases with land use change ( Arunrat et al, 2022 ; Ngaba et al, 2019 ), soil layers, and land use type ( Jobbágy & Jackson, 2000 ; Zhao et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%