Soil Organic Carbon Mineralization and its Temperature Sensitivity Along a Vegetation Restoration Gradient in Subtropical China

Abstract

Background and aims Soil organic carbon (SOC) mineralization produces important CO2 flux from terrestrial ecosystems which can provide feedbacks to climates. Vegetation restoration can affect SOC mineralization and its temperature sensitivity (Q10), but how this effect is related to soil moisture remains uncertain. Methods We performed a laboratory incubation using soils of different vegetation restoration stages (i.e., degraded vegetation [DS], plantation [PS], and secondary natural forest [SFS]) maintained under different moisture and temperature conditions to explore the combined effects of vegetation restoration and soil moisture on SOC mineralization and Q10. Results We found that cumulative SOC mineralization in PS and SFS were about 11.7 times higher than that in the DS, associated with higher SOC content and microbial biomass. Increased soil moisture and temperature led to higher SOC mineralization in the SFS and PS. However, in the DS, soil moisture did not affect SOC mineralization, but temperature enhancement solely increased (158.7%) SOC mineralization at the 60%MWHC treatment. Furthermore, significant interactive effect of vegetation restoration and soil moisture on Q10 was detected. At the 60%MWHC treatment, Q10 declined with vegetation restoration age. Nevertheless, at the 30%MWHC treatment, Q10 was lower in the DS than that in the PS. Higher soil moisture did not affect Q10 in the PS and SFS, but enhanced Q10 in the DS. Conclusions Our results highlight that the responses of SOC mineralization and Q10 to vegetation restoration were highly dependent on soil moisture and substrate availability, and vegetation restoration reduced the influence of soil moisture on Q10.

Coastal Wetland Restoration Strategies Based on Ecosystem Service Changes: A Case Study of the South Bank of Hangzhou Bay

“…The carbon density of LULC can be obtained by field sampling. However, field surveys are time-consuming and relatively difficult, while it has been shown that the carbon density of the same LULC in the same climate zone is similar [46,47]. Therefore, the carbon density data of each land use type required for this study referred to the existing studies in the neighboring areas.…”