2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil organic matter composition along altitudinal gradients in permafrost affected soils of the Subpolar Ural Mountains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparative analyses of molecular structure and elemental composition show that FAs are enriched in oxygen components, which determine increased hydrophilicity and ability to migrate in aqueous solutions (Table 3). Similar results were obtained previously for soils of Alaska [23] and the Ural Mountains [24]. The high relative content of carboxylic groups in FAs would increase their migration ability and biogeochemical activity in Polar terrestrial ecosystems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The comparative analyses of molecular structure and elemental composition show that FAs are enriched in oxygen components, which determine increased hydrophilicity and ability to migrate in aqueous solutions (Table 3). Similar results were obtained previously for soils of Alaska [23] and the Ural Mountains [24]. The high relative content of carboxylic groups in FAs would increase their migration ability and biogeochemical activity in Polar terrestrial ecosystems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Previous studies have found that the alkyl C and aromatic C concentrations of SOC vary among sites. For example, higher alkyl (~60%) and lower aromatic C (~19%) levels of the SOC were observed in an untouched forest soil in the northern part of the Subpolar Urals 54 and a significantly lower alkyl C (~10%) and higher aromatic C (~30%) of SOC were measured in the soil of Spanish oak forests 55 . Different alkyl C and aromatic C proportions among the study sites are probably explained by differences in plant functional types, microbial community structure, climate, and soil parent material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although the SOC densities showed relatively less variations with depth (Figure ), the upper 10 cm of soil in the control and exposed stages showed much higher organic carbon mineralization rates than the deeper soil layers. This result could be explained by the higher labile organic carbon contents that usually decrease with depth [ Dymov et al ., ] (i.e., the upper 10 cm of the control soils and exposed soils has higher labile organic matter contents). In contrast, some of these fractions were lost in drape stage, which resulted in less variation of the accumulative CO 2 production with depth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%