2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-14673-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil parameters affecting the levels of potentially harmful metals in Thessaly area, Greece: a robust quadratic regression approach of soil pollution prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our results, it was reported that calibration, validation, and prediction processes can be complicated and dependent on soil types and its physiochemical properties, the soil management history, chemical characteristics, and the analytical method, along with the sample size and distribution, as well as the prediction approaches [4,7,13,14,[27][28][29]54,61]. Based on 2250 soil samples that were collected in a 5-year period from four soil groups varying in clay mineralogy (Alfisols, Inceptisols, Entisols, and Vertisols) and a series of robust regression analyses, Golia and Diakoloukas [61] concluded that several factors (pH, electric conductivity, SOC, soil texture, exchangeable cations, and metal oxides along with coexisting metals) affect the total concentrations of Fe and Cd in soils. For instance, total Cd was reliably predicted with Cu and Zn in Entisols; clay, Pb, and CEC in Alfisols; and clay, Pb, and CEC in Vertisols [61].…”
Section: Accuracy Analysis Of the Plsr Modelssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to our results, it was reported that calibration, validation, and prediction processes can be complicated and dependent on soil types and its physiochemical properties, the soil management history, chemical characteristics, and the analytical method, along with the sample size and distribution, as well as the prediction approaches [4,7,13,14,[27][28][29]54,61]. Based on 2250 soil samples that were collected in a 5-year period from four soil groups varying in clay mineralogy (Alfisols, Inceptisols, Entisols, and Vertisols) and a series of robust regression analyses, Golia and Diakoloukas [61] concluded that several factors (pH, electric conductivity, SOC, soil texture, exchangeable cations, and metal oxides along with coexisting metals) affect the total concentrations of Fe and Cd in soils. For instance, total Cd was reliably predicted with Cu and Zn in Entisols; clay, Pb, and CEC in Alfisols; and clay, Pb, and CEC in Vertisols [61].…”
Section: Accuracy Analysis Of the Plsr Modelssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The results suggested that the M3 elements are related to the variation in soil type or texture and basic soil properties (mostly CaCO 3 and pH), along with coexisting metals that can reliably assist as predictive factors [61]. Moreover, the role of CaCO 3 (e.g., Ca and electrolyte sources, and pH modifier) on soil biogeochemistry is still overlooked in mountain soils and needs greater attention for the monitoring of land degradation and quality [2,60].…”
Section: Reference Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations