1997
DOI: 10.1080/00103629709369872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil pH and nitrogen changes following cattle and sheep urine deposition

Abstract: The relationship between animal urine deposition and variability in soil chemical composition and crop growth is not well established in the semiarid region of West Africa. This study was conducted to examine the changes over time in soil pH and mineral nitrogen (N) concentrations at the micro sites of cattle and sheep urine patches in comparison to those occurring in fertilizer urea placement zones. The urine and fertilizer solution containing each 400 mg N (800 kg N ha -1 ) were spread onto individual plots … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Urea alone was added rather than artificial cattle urine, since we wanted to avoid the interference from turnover of organic constituents in the urine (Bristow et al, 1992). The absence of hippuric acid probably delayed urea hydrolysis in the soil (Whitehead et al, 1989), thereby dampening the initial increase in pH (Sherlock and Goh, 1984;Somda et al, 1997), as well as the osmotic down-shock. Thus, it is likely that any stresses imposed on soil organisms would be as great or greater in a pasture after deposition of cattle urine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urea alone was added rather than artificial cattle urine, since we wanted to avoid the interference from turnover of organic constituents in the urine (Bristow et al, 1992). The absence of hippuric acid probably delayed urea hydrolysis in the soil (Whitehead et al, 1989), thereby dampening the initial increase in pH (Sherlock and Goh, 1984;Somda et al, 1997), as well as the osmotic down-shock. Thus, it is likely that any stresses imposed on soil organisms would be as great or greater in a pasture after deposition of cattle urine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since data on livestock and human excreta were obtained from secondary sources (Somda et al 1997; Powell et al 1998;Matsumoto et al 2010), uncertainties may be taken into consideration and some possibilities on the variation of results might be expected. Therefore, the actual nitrogen flow in the area focused on in this study may differ from the estimated values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the levels of dry matter produced per day per cow, sheep, and goat were 2,383, 345, and 197 g, respectively (Powell et al 1998). The average amount of individual sheep urine voiding was estimated on the basis of a previous study (Somda et al 1997), and was 64 g per urine voiding, with a total nitrogen level of 2.98 g kg -1 (Powell et al 1998).…”
Section: Livestockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, BCF altered the composition of moderately labile P in this study, and 1 M HCl‐Pi gradually dominated with increasing grazing density (Figure 2b). This observation can be linked to three possible phenomena: (a) the deposition of chicken manure gradually increases soil pH with increasing grazing density (Somda, Powell, & Bationo, 1997), which reduces the adsorption performance of iron–aluminum oxides (Yan, Wang, Liu, & Feng, 2019) and prevents it from complexing with more free phosphorus; (b) the stability of HCl‐extracted P is strongly dependent on soil pH, and HCl‐extracted P pools in high‐pH soils tend to contain highly stable calcium phosphate minerals (Helfenstein et al, 2020; Hou, Lu, Jiang, Wen, & Luo, 2019); and (c) the higher Ca 2+ in chicken manure may complex with dissolved Pi in the soil to form 1 M HCl‐Pi (Sugiyama et al, 2016). In synthesis, the P fraction was influenced by grazing density, and an increase in labile and moderately labile P increased the soil P availability and supply capacity in the BCF system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%