2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil potentials to resist continuous cropping obstacle: Three field cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total Ca content also accumulated in LA, which was also consistent with a previous study [66]. In terms of microbiota, LA rapidly resisted continuous cropping obstacles and showed characteristics of natural soils in 2016 [30,31]. LA also benefitted the soil nitrogen-fixing capacity and some plant-growth promotion rhizobacteria which is consistent with our hypothesis 1 [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: The Risks and Benefits Of Lasupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total Ca content also accumulated in LA, which was also consistent with a previous study [66]. In terms of microbiota, LA rapidly resisted continuous cropping obstacles and showed characteristics of natural soils in 2016 [30,31]. LA also benefitted the soil nitrogen-fixing capacity and some plant-growth promotion rhizobacteria which is consistent with our hypothesis 1 [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: The Risks and Benefits Of Lasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Then, the unclassified microbial communities were ignored, and the microbial communities that could be classified were selected to analyze the management scenario effects. In 2016 and 2017, LA had significant effects on the WPS-1 genera incertae sedis, which prefers natural soil, and on the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Rhizobiales (LDA score > 2, K-W test P < 0.05) [30][31][32] (Figure 4b). In 2018, some nitrogen-fixing bacteria and plantgrowth promotion bacteria increased in the LA, including Actinobacteria (class), Actinomycetales, Nocardioides, Azoarcus, Ramlibacter, and Arthrobacter (LDA score > 2, K-W test P < 0.05) [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] (Figure 4a).…”
Section: The Effects Of Management Scenarios On Microbial Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure and diversity of the soil microbial community are easily affected by factors such as climate change, vegetation types, and soil properties (Liang et al, 2015 ; Tang et al, 2020 ; Tan et al, 2021 ). Previous studies showed that the soil bacterial community structure of paddy fields with different cultivation years of continuous fertilization has differentiated, and the soil bacterial community of paddy fields with 25 years of cultivation is significantly different from that of 9 and 15 years of cultivation (Li et al, 2019a ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous cropping obstacles have been associated with lower microbial diversity, a decrease in beneficial microorganisms, and the enrichment of pathogenic microorganisms ( Gao et al, 2019 , 2021 ; Tan et al, 2021 ). According to the insurance hypothesis, biodiversity may act as a buffer against disturbances; in a diverse community, some species are likely to withstand disturbance and carry on functions ( Yachi and Loreau, 1999 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%