2004
DOI: 10.4141/s03-056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil properties influencing compactability of forest soils in British Columbia

Abstract: Soil properties influencing compactability of forest soils in British Columbia. Can. J. Soil Sci. 84: 219-226. The widespread use of heavy machinery during harvesting and site preparation in timber plantations in British Columbia (BC) has led to concerns that compaction causes a reduction in long-term soil productivity. Impacts of properties such as total C, water content, and texture on compactability of forest soils in BC were assessed. Two compactability indices were used: maximum bulk density (MBD) and sus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The timing of recovery of soil properties from soil disturbance varies with factors such as the original degree of disturbance (McNabb et al 2001), climate (Page-Dumroese et al 2006), soil texture (Steber et al 2007), organic matter content (Krzic et al 2004), and depth being considered (Zenner et al 2007). Upper mineral soil bulk density at this site was still significantly greater on the compaction treatments after 10 years, similar to the 10-year results of the LTSP network (Powers et al 2005), the 11 years of Puettmann et al (2008) and 12 years of Shepperd (1993), but in contrast to the return to pre-disturbance bulk density within 10 years documented by Bockheim et al (2005).…”
Section: Recovery Of Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The timing of recovery of soil properties from soil disturbance varies with factors such as the original degree of disturbance (McNabb et al 2001), climate (Page-Dumroese et al 2006), soil texture (Steber et al 2007), organic matter content (Krzic et al 2004), and depth being considered (Zenner et al 2007). Upper mineral soil bulk density at this site was still significantly greater on the compaction treatments after 10 years, similar to the 10-year results of the LTSP network (Powers et al 2005), the 11 years of Puettmann et al (2008) and 12 years of Shepperd (1993), but in contrast to the return to pre-disturbance bulk density within 10 years documented by Bockheim et al (2005).…”
Section: Recovery Of Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note: LUBD = log transformation of upper mineral soil bulk density year 10; CC% = square root transformation of % Calamagrostis cover at Year 10; OM3= removal of the forest floor, dummy variable; L∆BD = log transformation of pre-to post-treatment change in upper mineral soil bulk density. The use of relative bulk density can provide a quantitative comparison of compaction over a range of soil textures (Krzic et al 2004). Relative bulk density is the ratio of soil bulk density to a reference density (Hakansson and Lipiec 2000), often a maximum bulk density value determined by a Proctor test (ASTM n.d.).…”
Section: Recovery Of Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Krzic et al (2004) comprovaram, investigando o efeito da matéria orgânica do solo sobre o grau de compactação ou densidade relativa do solo, que o incremento de 1% no teor de carbono orgânico reduz, independentemente da textura do solo, a densidade relativa máxima do solo em 11%; esses resultados confirmam a importância da adoção de sistemas de manejo que promovam o aumento no teor de matéria orgânica do solo.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…a matéria orgânica do solo repercute no valor da densidade máxima do solo, tanto pela melhoria na estabilidade estrutural do solo, como pelo fato de a densidade dela ser menor do que a dos sólidos do solo. Krzic et al (2004), investigando o efeito da matéria orgânica do solo sobre o grau de compactação ou densidade relativa do solo, comprovaram que o incremento de 1 % no teor de carbono orgânico reduz, independentemente da textura do solo, a densidade relativa máxima do solo em aproximadamente 11 %. esses resultados confirmam a importância da adoção de sistemas de manejo que promovam o aumento no teor de matéria orgânica do solo.…”
unclassified