2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2015.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil quality indicators selection by mixed models and multivariate techniques in deforested areas for agricultural use in NW of Chaco, Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
16

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
23
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest SOC loss (45 %) was found in the top 20 cm of the soil. This SOC loss was similar to the reported by Rojas et al (2016), who only evaluated the top 20 cm of soil. On the other hand, Conti et al (2014) studied soil profile up to 200 cm depth under different ecosystem types (native and secondary forest, two different shrublands and cropping) in the southern Semiarid Chaco and observed less SOC stock under cropping than under native forest only in the 0-10 cm depth.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The highest SOC loss (45 %) was found in the top 20 cm of the soil. This SOC loss was similar to the reported by Rojas et al (2016), who only evaluated the top 20 cm of soil. On the other hand, Conti et al (2014) studied soil profile up to 200 cm depth under different ecosystem types (native and secondary forest, two different shrublands and cropping) in the southern Semiarid Chaco and observed less SOC stock under cropping than under native forest only in the 0-10 cm depth.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…First, land allocation to categories of conservation value (low, medium, high) should incorporate indicators of soil quality and health as criteria for land zoning. Soil organic C can be a suitable indicator to incorporate soil quality as criteria for land zoning (Weil and Magdoff, 2004;Powlson et al, 2011;Rojas et al, 2016). However, to correctly incorporate this indicator in land use decisions we need to know the threshold value of SOC contents beyond which soil functionality becomes impaired.…”
Section: Implications For Soil Management Decisions and Regulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the search for appropriate ways to evaluate the impacts of human practices on soil quality, several researchers have recommended that the evaluation of soil physical indicators should have simple and lowcost methodologies, enabling faster analysis (Mendes, Melloni, & Melloni, 2006;Nesbitt and Adl, 2014;Sun et al, 2014;Faleschini, Zanini, Pellegrino, & Pasinato, 2016), and better reflecting the differences in soil quality (Araújo, Goedert, & Lacerda, 2007;Garcia & Rosolem 2010;Barreto et al, 2014;Desjeux et al, 2015;Duval, Galantini, Martinez, López, & Wall, 2016;Sarathjith, Sankar, Wani, & Sahrawat, 2016). Since aggregates constitute the main structural components of the soil, they have been widely used as quality indicators in conservation systems (Dexter, 1988;Ferreira, 2010;Lourente et al, 2011;Juhos, Szabó, & Ladányi, 2016;Rojas, Prause, Sanzano, Arce, & Sánchez, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Además, se encuentran directamente relacionados con la fertilidad del suelo y con su capacidad de retención hídrica (Álvarez & Steinbach, 2006), al regular la acidez y aumentar la disponibilidad de nutrientes (principalmente nitrógeno), proporcionar coloide de alta capacidad de intercambio catiónico y favorecer la porosidad del suelo (Kramer et al, 2006;Martínez et al, 2008). Los cambios en el uso del suelo pueden causar una degradación significativa de algunos parámetros en comparación con el suelo en condiciones prístinas, afectando la calidad física y química en un tiempo relativamente corto (Rojas et al, 2016).…”
Section: La Importancia Del Carbono Como Servicio Ecosistémico Intermunclassified