1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf01449190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil radiocarbon analysis and soil dating

Abstract: Abstract. Based on 14C dating principles, techniques of measuring 14C concentrations in pedogenic organic materials have been well established. Basic lines of soil sample pretreatment for radiocarbon analysis by liquid scintillation are shown. Possible influences of lithogenic carbon on the results obtained are discussed.Soil organic matter 14C analysis results can-according to the radiocarbon dating formula-be interpreted as minimum ages of the soil under investigation if strong evidence for autochthonous ped… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
3

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In most pedogenic settings the organic matter present is of mixed age because the upper part of a soil profile is biologically active and in dynamic equilibrium with the 14C of the atmosphere (Paul 1969;Scharpenseel and Schiffmann 1977b;Ellis and Matthews 1984). This results in relatively low radiocarbon ages for thin youthful soils (Benedict 1966;Ellis 1979) and for the near-surface layers of deeper organic horizons (Matthews 1981, 1984: Matthews and Dresser 1983.…”
Section: Soil Ages At the Time Of Burialmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In most pedogenic settings the organic matter present is of mixed age because the upper part of a soil profile is biologically active and in dynamic equilibrium with the 14C of the atmosphere (Paul 1969;Scharpenseel and Schiffmann 1977b;Ellis and Matthews 1984). This results in relatively low radiocarbon ages for thin youthful soils (Benedict 1966;Ellis 1979) and for the near-surface layers of deeper organic horizons (Matthews 1981, 1984: Matthews and Dresser 1983.…”
Section: Soil Ages At the Time Of Burialmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cretaceous coals are common in this region (Allan and Carr 1947) and are a major problem in 14C dating (see Scharpenseel and Schiffmann 1977~). Unfortunately, as is characteristic of virtually all of the southem Canadian Rocky Mountains, the calcareous nature of most of the local drift meant there was still the possibility of sample contamination by inorganic carbonates (see Scharpenseel and Schiffmann 1977b;Ellis and Matthews 1984).…”
Section: Soil Ages At the Time Of Burialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is related to a general problem associated with dating soils everywhere; the accurate dating of soil carbon is notoriously complex due to a variety of potential contamination vectors (Chichagova and Cherkinsky, 1993;Evans, 1985;Liu, 1985;Scharpenseel, 1971;Scharpenseel and Schiffmann, 1977). Generally, "in soil 14 C dating, 'soil age' is definable and applicable for absolute dating in a limited way, only in the case of well-protected paleosols, charcoal or wood relics" (Scharpenseel and Becker-Heidmann, 1992:548).…”
Section: Dating Chinese Paleosolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of old carbon from these sources may alter the calcic nodule's radiocarbon age because geological limestone carbon used to form CaCO 3 contains significantly less radiocarbon than the atmosphere. The net effect is that 14 C dates on calcic nodules can be "older" than the nodules true geological age (Scharpenseel and Schiffmann, 1977;Stafford Jr. 1998;Chen et al 2002).…”
Section: Limitations Of Radiocarbon Dating On Pedogenic Carbonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, upon formation, nodules from the carbonatebearing sediments or from sediments where pedogenic or groundwater carbonate are common are susceptible to postmortem exchange of their indigenous carbonate with foreign (exogenous) carbonate (Scharpenseel and Schiffmann, 1977;Stafford Jr. 1998;Chen et al 2002;Deutz et al 2002). This secondary carbonate can have radiocarbon contents ranging from modern values to undetectable, the latter representing carbon from geologically ancient carbonates.…”
Section: Limitations Of Radiocarbon Dating On Pedogenic Carbonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%