2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2014.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil redistribution and crop productivity in loess areas (Lublin Upland, Poland)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the initial ST of a plough layer may be modified by transport processes related to tillage, harvests of root or tuber crops and erosion. Thus, the texture also depends on the topography of the field and management practices ( Koćmit and Podlasiński , 2002; Brevik et al, 2003; Paluszek , 2010; Urricariet et al, 2011; Pontes de Oliveira et al, 2013; Rejman et al, 2014). The soil texture of both the plough layer and subsoil is modified very slowly by the eluviation of clay to the deeper layers, which occurs in many landscapes ( Bockheim and Hartemink , 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the initial ST of a plough layer may be modified by transport processes related to tillage, harvests of root or tuber crops and erosion. Thus, the texture also depends on the topography of the field and management practices ( Koćmit and Podlasiński , 2002; Brevik et al, 2003; Paluszek , 2010; Urricariet et al, 2011; Pontes de Oliveira et al, 2013; Rejman et al, 2014). The soil texture of both the plough layer and subsoil is modified very slowly by the eluviation of clay to the deeper layers, which occurs in many landscapes ( Bockheim and Hartemink , 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sum of accumulated and eroded soil material for all studied profiles was 29.52 and 32.59 m, respectively. The amounts divided by total number of profiles showed that the average profile was overbuilt by 0.23 m and eroded by 0.26 m. Assuming that soil density is 1.3 Mg m −3 [ 13 ] total erosion was 4394 Mg. From that amount, 88% was deposited within the study area, and 12% removed outside. Taking into account the period of arable land use of the area (185 years), total soil erosion was 23.8 Mg ha −1 year −1 in the studied area, that is, 1.41 mm year −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density of depressions is assessed within the range from 1 to 16 per km −2 [ 9 , 10 ]. The modification of pedons resulted in redistribution of soil material and changes in soil properties [ 6 , 11 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wraz ze spadkiem nachylenia oraz wzrostem długości stoku udział erozji uprawowej maleje na rzecz erozji wodnej. Wpływ erozji agrotechnicznej na kształtowanie rzeźby jest zatem szczególnie duży na lessowych obszarach rolniczych, charakteryzujących się drobnopromienną rzeźbą o krótkich i stromych, zwykle wypukło-wklęsłych, rozczłonkowanych stokach (Rodzik 2001, Rejman i in. 2014.…”
Section: 2 2 Procesy Stokoweunclassified