Soil resistance and recovery during neotropical forest succession

Abstract

The recovery of soil conditions is crucial for successful ecosystem restoration and, hence, for achieving the goals of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Here, we assess how soils resist forest conversion and agricultural land use, and how soils recover during subsequent tropical forest succession on abandoned agricultural fields. Our overarching question is how soil resistance and recovery depend on local conditions such as climate, soil type and land-use history. For 300 plots in 21 sites across the Neotropics, we used a chronosequence approach in which we sampled soils from two depths in old-growth forests, agricultural fields (i.e. crop fields and pastures), and secondary forests that differ in age (1–95 years) since abandonment. We measured six soil properties using a standardized sampling design and laboratory analyses. Soil resistance strongly depended on local conditions. Croplands and sites on high-activity clay (i.e. high fertility) show strong increases in bulk density and decreases in pH, carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) during deforestation and subsequent agricultural use. Resistance is lower in such sites probably because of a sharp decline in fine root biomass in croplands in the upper soil layers, and a decline in litter input from formerly productive old-growth forest (on high-activity clays). Soil recovery also strongly depended on local conditions. During forest succession, high-activity clays and croplands decreased most strongly in bulk density and increased in C and N, possibly because of strongly compacted soils with low C and N after cropland abandonment, and because of rapid vegetation recovery in high-activity clays leading to greater fine root growth and litter input. Furthermore, sites at low precipitation decreased in pH, whereas sites at high precipitation increased in N and decreased in C : N ratio. Extractable phosphorus (P) did not recover during succession, suggesting increased P limitation as forests age. These results indicate that no single solution exists for effective soil restoration and that local site conditions should determine the restoration strategies. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration’.

A practice-led assessment of landscape restoration potential in a biodiversity hotspot

“…Framework species planting [53] was planned in areas > 100–300 m from nearby intact forest (< 40–80% deficit) and savanna/agro-ecological mosaic (< 40–50% deficit), where seed dispersal was assumed to be restricted [16,17,54]. Severely degraded sites with ≥ 95 ± 5% AGB deficit were assumed to require soil improvement ([55] and [56]) followed by planting pioneer, nitrogen-fixing plants to be replaced with native trees over time [19] Soil improvement and nurse planting≥ 95 (≥ 90 to ≥ 100)AnyAny…”

Identifying hotspots for ecosystem restoration across heterogeneous tropical savannah-dominated regions

“…Although lower than the rainforests of Amazonia and Mata Atlântica [ 78 ], the potential total biomass stocks of restored W&F in the Cerrado are high, particularly at the transition zones at the edges of the region (electronic supplementary material, table S1 and figure S7) [ 44 , 72 ]. SOC content and soil quality indicators are often neglected in empirical tropical restoration studies [ 79 ] and understanding SOC gains or losses as a result of restoration will be critical for further prioritization attempts [ 80 , 81 ]. Although potential SOC gains from restoration are not included in our analysis, a recent study demonstrated that SOC gains in grassland vegetation under high CO 2 could be greater than those of forested areas, suggesting that tropical grasslands may be more important for long-term C storage in soils [ 82 ].…”

Fifteen essential science advances needed for effective restoration of the world's forest landscapes

“…[ 97 ] demonstrate that root traits of planted trees can be used to predict species success in dry forests. Further new research in this theme issue shows how information on soils is necessary for tailoring restoration and remediation methods to local site conditions [ 70 , 98 ].…”