2011
DOI: 10.1134/s1067413611060166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil respiration of forest ecosystems in gradients of environmental pollution by emissions from copper smelters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the effect of contamination on soil res piration was slight near the Middle Ural and the Karabash copper smelling plants (in spruce fir and birch forests, respectively). The respiration dropped sharply only in the technogenic wasteland and did not depend on the distance from the contamination sources, metal content in the forest litter, or its acidity (Smorkalov and Vorobeichik, 2011). Contrary to other microbiological characteristics, the respiration of fresh soil samples taken along a 34 km long transect set from the Severonikel' plant (the Kola Peninsula) did not depend on HM contamination (Paton et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the effect of contamination on soil res piration was slight near the Middle Ural and the Karabash copper smelling plants (in spruce fir and birch forests, respectively). The respiration dropped sharply only in the technogenic wasteland and did not depend on the distance from the contamination sources, metal content in the forest litter, or its acidity (Smorkalov and Vorobeichik, 2011). Contrary to other microbiological characteristics, the respiration of fresh soil samples taken along a 34 km long transect set from the Severonikel' plant (the Kola Peninsula) did not depend on HM contamination (Paton et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The intensity of CO 2 emission from soils of birch forests of the background and buffering zone was higher than in coniferous forests near the copper smelting plants in the Ural Mountains, though these differences were not always statistically reliable (Smorkalov and Vorobeichik, 2011). Deciduous for ests are usually characterized by a higher intensity of soil respiration, because the soils under them are rich in nutrients and the litter decomposition is more intensive in them than in coniferous forests (Raich and Tufekcioglu, 2000;Khomik et al, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three zones can be distinguished along the contamination gradient, impact, buffer, and background zones (1-3 km, 4-7 km, and 20-30 km away from the smelter, respectively), representing successive stages of industrial degradation of native spruce-fir forest ecosystems (Smorkalov and Vorobeichik 2011). There is detailed information available on the study area with regard to the effect of metal pollution on soil properties (Kaigorodova and Vorobeichik 1996;Vorobeichik and Kaigorodova 2017), in particular with regard to the effect of metal pollution on the thickness of forest litter (Korkina and Vorobeichik 2018;Vorobeichik 1995) and the state of soil organic matter (Korkina and Vorobeichik 2018;Prokopovich and Kaigorodova 1999).…”
Section: Soil Sampling and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is detailed information available on the study area with regard to the effect of metal pollution on soil properties (Kaigorodova and Vorobeichik 1996;Vorobeichik and Kaigorodova 2017), in particular with regard to the effect of metal pollution on the thickness of forest litter (Korkina and Vorobeichik 2018;Vorobeichik 1995) and the state of soil organic matter (Korkina and Vorobeichik 2018;Prokopovich and Kaigorodova 1999). Likewise, there is detailed information on the effect of metal pollution on tree stand (Usoltsev et al 2012), herbaceous vegetation (Vorobeichik et al 2014), soil fungi (Mikryukov et al 2015), soil respiration (Smorkalov and Vorobeichik 2011;Smorkalov and Vorobeichik 2016), soil-dwelling macroinvertebrates (Vorobeichik 1998;Vorobeichik et al 2019;Vorobeichik et al 2012), soil microarthropods, and ground running macroinvertebrates (Ermakov 2004). Some of this information is summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Soil Sampling and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respiration studies on polluted soils are mostly performed in the lab under controlled conditions, as natural fluctuations of environmental variables were regarded as problematic, hampering interpretation from the effect of pollutants (Brookes 1995). Indeed, responses of in situ basal respiration (BR) to metal contamination have not been consistent so far (Bian et al 2015;Ramsey et al 2005a;Ramsey et al 2005b;Smorkalov and Vorobeichik 2011). However, soil sampling and processing disrupts the intimate relations between microorganisms, plant roots and soil particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%