2021
DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2021.1921190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Sampling Strategies for the Characterization of Spatial Variability Under Two Distinct Land Uses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two indicators, skewness and kurtosis, revealed significant positive deviation values and kurtosis values of the SO 4 2− and Cl − contents in the samples from the three soil layers at 360 sampling sites in the study area. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the data reflects the degree of dispersion of the random variables, referring to relevant studies [27][28][29]. When CV ≤ 0.1, this represents weak variability; 0.1 < CV < 1 represents moderate variability; and CV ≥ 1 represents strong variability.…”
Section: Salinization Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two indicators, skewness and kurtosis, revealed significant positive deviation values and kurtosis values of the SO 4 2− and Cl − contents in the samples from the three soil layers at 360 sampling sites in the study area. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the data reflects the degree of dispersion of the random variables, referring to relevant studies [27][28][29]. When CV ≤ 0.1, this represents weak variability; 0.1 < CV < 1 represents moderate variability; and CV ≥ 1 represents strong variability.…”
Section: Salinization Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%