2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil temperature and brGDGTs along an elevation gradient on the northeastern Tibetan Plateau: A test of soil brGDGTs as a proxy for paleoelevation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies on soil datasets in China have pointed out that in relatively cold areas (observed MAAT <6 °C), the temperature reconstructed based on MATmr may greatly overestimate observation temperature (Wang et al, 2020), such as the Laji Mountains in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau (Wang and Liu, 2021). This is consistent with our research results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Some studies on soil datasets in China have pointed out that in relatively cold areas (observed MAAT <6 °C), the temperature reconstructed based on MATmr may greatly overestimate observation temperature (Wang et al, 2020), such as the Laji Mountains in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau (Wang and Liu, 2021). This is consistent with our research results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The lapse rate associated with the reconstructed temperature based on our equations is −0.60 °C/100 m, similar to that based on observed temperatures from the meteorological meters that we set (−0.67 °C/100 m). This lapse rate is also similar to reported lapse rates from the northern slope of the Qilian Shan (−0.58 °C/100 m) (Zhang et al, 2001) and the neighboring Laji Mountain (−0.65 °C/ 100 m) (Wang and Liu, 2021). However, one study reported a lower lapse rate from the south slope of Lenglongling in the Qilian Shan (−0.51 °C /100 m) from higher elevations (elevation 3,200-4,300 m) and higher precipitation ranges (Wang et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations