2005
DOI: 10.1515/sg-2005-0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Temperature and Precipitation Affect the Rooting Ability of Dormant Hardwood Cuttings of Populus

Abstract: In addition to genetic control, responses to environmental stimuli affect the success of rooting. Our objectives were to: 1) assess the variation in rooting ability among 21 Populus clones grown under varying soil temperatures and amounts of precipitation and 2) identify combinations of soil temperature and precipitation that promote rooting. The clones belonged to five genomic groups ([P. trichocarpa Torr. & Gray x P. deltoides Bartr. ex Marsh] x P. deltoides ‘BC’; P. deltoides ‘D’; P. deltoides x P. maxi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Populus spp. have genetic and morphological distinctness (Karrenberg et al 2002, Zalesny et al 2005; also ecological differences emerge in studies comparing genus, species or hybrids in traits as tolerance to damage (Nordman et al 2005, Powers et al 2006, growth strategies adopted throughout the season (Tharakan et al 2005), root development (McIvor et al 2013), suitability for phytoremediation purposes (Dos Santos et al 2007, Borghi et al 2008 or suitability for short rotation coppice (Laureysens et al 2005, Tharakan et al 2005. Thus, this versatility in plant characteristics of poplars and willows would explain the differences in responses to defoliation observed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…and Populus spp. have genetic and morphological distinctness (Karrenberg et al 2002, Zalesny et al 2005; also ecological differences emerge in studies comparing genus, species or hybrids in traits as tolerance to damage (Nordman et al 2005, Powers et al 2006, growth strategies adopted throughout the season (Tharakan et al 2005), root development (McIvor et al 2013), suitability for phytoremediation purposes (Dos Santos et al 2007, Borghi et al 2008 or suitability for short rotation coppice (Laureysens et al 2005, Tharakan et al 2005. Thus, this versatility in plant characteristics of poplars and willows would explain the differences in responses to defoliation observed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…On one side are genetic sources of variation (MELCHIOR and HATTEMER, 1966;WILCOX and FARMER, 1968;YING and BAGLEY, 1979;GUZINA, 1987, HAN et al, 1994KOVACEVIC et al, 2005) and differences among cuttings within genotype, known as C -effect (SMITH and WAREING, 1972;YING and BAGLEY, 1977;LI et al, 1998). There are also factors of the environment such as: soil texture (WILCOX and FARMER, 1968), temperature and precipitation (ZALESNY et al, 2005), microrelief (ALKINANI, 1972), storing conditions (NANDA and ANAND, 1970;FEGE, 1984) and nursery technology (FEGE, 1983). …”
Section: Evaluation Of Early Rooting Traits Of Eastern Cottonwoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EX MARSH) particularly, could still compromise nursery production and the establishment of short rotation plantations for the production of biomass, as well. That is why modern poplar breeding programs regularly evaluate rooting ability of hardwood cuttings and its survival (TESSIER DU CROSS, 1984;GUZINA, 1987;HAN et al, 1994;ZALESNY et al, 2005).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Early Rooting Traits Of Eastern Cottonwoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, DN Populus clones performed similarly when irrigated with leachate or water. Recently, researchers have reported below-average growth performance (i.e., rooting, diameter, and height) of traditional DN genotypes such as clones DN34 and DN182 (Riemenschneider et al, 2001;Zalesny and Wiese, 2006;Zalesny et al, 2005a), which has led to the consideration of less deployment of these DN clones, especially in the North Central United States. However, the results of the current study were important because, along with phytoremediation capabilities (Zalesny and Bauer, 2007) and promising results from recent breeding efforts (Neil Nelson, USFS NCRS, William Berguson, University of Minnesota NRRI, personal communication) DN clones appear to be suitable genotypes for the cleanup of leachate with similar contaminant levels and, possibly, of other contaminants.…”
Section: Elements In Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%