2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-013-1833-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil test measures of available P (Colwell, resin and DGT) compared with plant P uptake using isotope dilution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deepest insights in the dynamic aspects of P mobilization and immobilization in soils have been obtained with isotopic dilution techniques (Frossard et al, 2011). It has been shown that batch extracts mobilize P from pools not directly available to plants (Mason et al, 2013;Six et al, 2013). More comparable to the root's approach is to strip phosphate from the solid phase by lowering the soil-solution concentration, which can be achieved by establishing an infinite diffusional sink (Frossard et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deepest insights in the dynamic aspects of P mobilization and immobilization in soils have been obtained with isotopic dilution techniques (Frossard et al, 2011). It has been shown that batch extracts mobilize P from pools not directly available to plants (Mason et al, 2013;Six et al, 2013). More comparable to the root's approach is to strip phosphate from the solid phase by lowering the soil-solution concentration, which can be achieved by establishing an infinite diffusional sink (Frossard et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Vertisol, as all the chemical extractions demonstrated, TSP performed best (Xiong et al, 2018a). The superior accuracy of DGT relative to Colwell and anion resin methods in assessing true plant availability of P has been documented before (Mason et al, 2013). The main disadvantage is that it is more labor intensive than traditional wet chemical extractions.…”
Section: Slow Releasersmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…There are only a few studies that use the ratio of specific activities in plants and soils, but none of them pertaining to Cd. According to Mason et al (2013) and Muraoka et al (1983), a ratio for plant/ extractants around 0.60 could be considered efficient. Plants can serve as reference tools for assessing nutrient levels in the soil, thus reflecting actual nutrient availability.…”
Section: Extractant Effectiveness and The L Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%