2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil type and integrated nitrogen nutrient-rice straw residue management techniques affect soil microbes, enzyme activities and yield of wheat crop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon cannot be attributed to the growth process of maize or changes in the environment because the AS in the control treatment did not show a similar decrease (Figure 3). We speculate that adding straw may also have a positive stimulatory effect on soil microbial residues [40,41]; however, this aspect has not received sufficient attention in previous studies. Cui et al [42] found that the accumulation of microbial residues can lead to a peak in the microbial community that degrades them, which is consistent with the findings of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This phenomenon cannot be attributed to the growth process of maize or changes in the environment because the AS in the control treatment did not show a similar decrease (Figure 3). We speculate that adding straw may also have a positive stimulatory effect on soil microbial residues [40,41]; however, this aspect has not received sufficient attention in previous studies. Cui et al [42] found that the accumulation of microbial residues can lead to a peak in the microbial community that degrades them, which is consistent with the findings of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This study showed clear response of enzyme activities by co-application of Azolla, rice straw, and synthetic fertilizers on URE activity over sole Effects of co-application of Azolla, rice straw, and NPKS fertilizer combination on soil urease, acid, and alkaline phosphatases; small bars are standard errors at p< 0.05. synthetic fertilizers (Figure 4). The higher urease activity in treatment involve Azolla combined with 50% reduced N, along with 30 kg P ha −1 , 30 kg K ha −1 , and 20 kg S ha −1 , and co-treatment of Azolla, rice straw + 100 kg N ha −1 , 30 kg P ha −1 , 30 kg K ha −1 , and 20 kg S ha −1 could be attributed to improvement of soil organic carbon content that directly enhances microbial community (Luo et al, 2016;Sharma et al, 2021;Singh et al, 2023). Generally, an increase in urease activity indicates an improvement in the ability of microorganisms in the soil to convert urea into ammonium and make it available to plants.…”
Section: Enzyme Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The likelihood of erosion is decreased by the addition of crop residue to the soil or as surface cover in the blocks of mulch [65]. The T3 treatment (deep ploughed treatment) had the highest final infiltration rate (cm h −1 ), followed by the T2 treatment, and the T4 treatment had the lowest final infiltration rate (cm h −1 ) (Figure 2) due to the presence of a substantial number of macropores and enhanced microbial activity [66].…”
Section: Infiltration Rate and Cumulative Infiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%