2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-015-0144-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar Dynamics, Rotation, Convection and Overshoot

Abstract: We discuss recent observational, theoretical and modeling progress made in understanding the Sun's internal dynamics, including its rotation, meridional flow, convection and overshoot. Over the past few decades, substantial theoretical and observational effort has gone into appreciating these aspects of solar dynamics. A review of these observations, related helioseismic methodology and inference and computational results in relation to these problems is undertaken here.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(117 reference statements)
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The most ambitious of these studies that have so far appeared do indeed succeed in reproducing cyclic magnetic activity, together with meridional velocities that have a complicated, time-dependent structure. At high latitudes there is an equatorward flow at the tachocline, with poleward motion in most of the convection zone, giving way to equatorward flow above 0.9R⊙ and rapid poleward velocities nearer to the surface (Passos, Charbonneau & Miesch 2015;Hanasoge et al 2015). The corresponding azimuthal fields accumulate near the tachocline and display dipole symmetry; they reverse cyclically and have been followed for 40 activity cycles, with an average period of 40 years (Passos & Charbonneau 2014;Passos, Charbonneau & Miesch 2015).…”
Section: Super-modulation and Symmetry Changes In The Solar Dynamomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most ambitious of these studies that have so far appeared do indeed succeed in reproducing cyclic magnetic activity, together with meridional velocities that have a complicated, time-dependent structure. At high latitudes there is an equatorward flow at the tachocline, with poleward motion in most of the convection zone, giving way to equatorward flow above 0.9R⊙ and rapid poleward velocities nearer to the surface (Passos, Charbonneau & Miesch 2015;Hanasoge et al 2015). The corresponding azimuthal fields accumulate near the tachocline and display dipole symmetry; they reverse cyclically and have been followed for 40 activity cycles, with an average period of 40 years (Passos & Charbonneau 2014;Passos, Charbonneau & Miesch 2015).…”
Section: Super-modulation and Symmetry Changes In The Solar Dynamomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, these simulation results also indicate that the Sun may be near the tipping point between these two rotational regimes. It must be noted however that the limited range of spatial scales in numerical simulations may lead one to over-estimate the amplitude of convective flows (see Hanasoge et al 2015;Greer et al 2015 and references therein), which would in turn change the critical stellar Rossby number at which this transition occur. One could nevertheless infer from these simulation results that a simple, monotonic relationship between cycle and rotation periods is not to be expected, considering that differential rotation is a key inductive process in the vast majority of extant solar/stellar dynamo scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matter was first seriously considered by Spiegel andZahn (1992, see also Spiegel (1972)). They, like I here, did not discuss the cause of differential rotation of the convection zone: it is evidently the result of a balance between the angular-momentum-transporting Reynolds stress, Maxwell stress and advection by large-scale meridional flow, a matter which is reviewed briefly by Hanasoge et al (2015) in this volume. Instead, recognizing that the global equilibration timescale of convection is no doubt much shorter than the dynamical timescales of processes operating beneath (even if they are related to the solar cycle), Spiegel and Zahn considered the convection-zone shear to be given, and ignored any back-reaction of the tachocline dynamics on the convection zone.…”
Section: The Steady Laminar Tachoclinementioning
confidence: 94%