2022
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5b72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar Energetic Particles Produced during Two Fast Coronal Mass Ejections

Abstract: Two recent extremely fast coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are of particular interest. The first one originated from the southern hemisphere on 2021 October 28 and caused strong solar energetic particle (SEP) events over a wide longitude range from Earth, STEREO-A, to Mars. However, the other one, originating from the center of the Earth-viewed solar disk 5 days later, left weak SEP signatures in the heliosphere. Based on the white-light images of the CMEs from the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The event we select is the second GOES X-class flare in solar cycle 25, hosted in NOAA active region 12887, occurring around 15:35 UT on 2021 October 28. This event has been reported by other papers, which focused on some observational features, such as observations of EUV waves and the corresponding CME (Devi et al 2022;Hou et al 2022), the CME three-part structure (Devi et al 2022), the eruption mechanism (Yamasaki et al 2022), the Sun-as-a-star spectroscopic characteristics (Xu et al 2022), the solar energetic particles (Li et al 2022), and the geomagnetic effects (Papaioannou et al 2022). It would be of great interest to check in what degree such a geoeffective solar eruption can be reproduced with a data-driven radiative MHD model.…”
Section: Event Overview and Numerical Setupsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The event we select is the second GOES X-class flare in solar cycle 25, hosted in NOAA active region 12887, occurring around 15:35 UT on 2021 October 28. This event has been reported by other papers, which focused on some observational features, such as observations of EUV waves and the corresponding CME (Devi et al 2022;Hou et al 2022), the CME three-part structure (Devi et al 2022), the eruption mechanism (Yamasaki et al 2022), the Sun-as-a-star spectroscopic characteristics (Xu et al 2022), the solar energetic particles (Li et al 2022), and the geomagnetic effects (Papaioannou et al 2022). It would be of great interest to check in what degree such a geoeffective solar eruption can be reproduced with a data-driven radiative MHD model.…”
Section: Event Overview and Numerical Setupsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…This event produced a strong CME which has been well studied in many papers (Hou et al 2022;Li et al 2022;Papaioannou et al 2022;Xu et al 2022). It is thus of new interest how this MFR grows into the CME, although the present simulation domain is not large enough to fully trace the MFR in a long range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As for the SEP characteristics, the peak proton flux with E >10 MeV turned out only ~30 pfu (1 pfu = 1 particle cm −2 s −1 sr −1 ) which is lower than that observed in most GLEs (Papaioannou et al 2022;Li et al 2022). The fact that the >10 MeV proton flux remained increased (albeit with a softer spectrum) for almost a week was due primarily to the delayed prolonged acceleration, associated with the post-eruption energy release (see below) and the CME-driven shock from the given flare, and, then, to a number of additional overlapping proton flares and CMEs.…”
Section: Overview Of the Eventmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The estimated plane-of-sky speed of CME and its nose white-light shock were about 1240 and 1640 km 𝑠 −1 , respectively, i.e. quite high, but noticeably less than in most GLEs (see Li et al 2022;Papaioannou et al 2022). The intensive type II and III radio bursts with components from metric to kilometer wavelengths accompanied the flare and CME (Klein et al 2022).…”
Section: Overview Of the Eventmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation