“…Above UV observations were generally higher than those (Table ) in Beijing (0.38 MJ m −2 ), Luancheng (0.43 MJ m −2 ), Yucheng (0.47 MJ m −2 ), Fengqiu (0.49 MJ m −2 ), Wuhan (0.49 MJ m −2 ), Jiaozhouwan (0.51 MJ m −2 ), Changwu (0.52 MJ m −2 ), Sanjiang (0.53 MJ m −2 ) and Shapotou (0.59 MJ m −2 ), lower than those at Haibei (0.67 MJ m −2 ) and LS (0.92 MJ m −2 ) in China (Hu et al ., , , , ; Wang et al ., ), which may be attributed to the different geographical locations and climate types, such as altitude, aerosol burden, water vapour and ozone concentrations. The findings can also be compared with those in other observations around the world, which were clearly shown in Table , for example, annual mean daily UV radiation was about 0.42, 0.55, 0.67, 0.83 MJ m −2 in Łódź (Poland), Maceió (Brazil), New Delhi (India), Valencia (Spain), respectively (Cañada et al ., ; Murillo et al ., ; Jacovides et al ., ; Bano et al ., ). Similar comparisons have also been conducted in our earlier study (Wang et al ., ), which will be further analysed in later studies.…”