“…The estimated monthly thermal load profile of the facility (MWhth/month) is shown in Figure 8 (blue bars), and the estimated solar thermal yield (MWhth/month) is also shown (green bars). As shown in Figure 8, it is expected that the modeled solar IPH solution without a TES could, in the best solar resource months (e.g., June to September), meet greater than 20% of the facility's thermal demands (Laadel et al 2018). It is expected that the use of a hybrid RTES (i.e., CSP and TES) would increase the renewable heat fraction (e.g., above 26%), as in Figure 8 (Laadel et al 2018).…”