2022
DOI: 10.1002/tqem.21895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar oxidation and removal of arsenic from water: An experimental study

Abstract: Arsenic poses a significant threat to both human health and the environment. Arsenic removal through solar oxidation has been investigated in a batch process. Arsenic was artificially added to both deionized and tap water to conduct the experiments. Clean, colorless, transparent, Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) bottles were used for Solar Oxidation and Removal of Arsenic (SORAS) experiments. Various parameters including concentration of arsenic, iron, and photo-catalyst were varied during the experiments.The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No change was observed after the contact time was increased from 120 min to 24 h, hence, all further experiments were conducted with a contact time of 120 min. A similar trend for arsenic adsorption by nanoparticles prepared from rice husk (Pillai et al., 2020) and iron oxide nanoparticles modified activated carbon (Ha et al., 2021) has been observed in previous studies. Adsorption occurs in a short duration, adsorption sites get saturated, and no removal occurs after saturation (Mohan et al., 2019).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No change was observed after the contact time was increased from 120 min to 24 h, hence, all further experiments were conducted with a contact time of 120 min. A similar trend for arsenic adsorption by nanoparticles prepared from rice husk (Pillai et al., 2020) and iron oxide nanoparticles modified activated carbon (Ha et al., 2021) has been observed in previous studies. Adsorption occurs in a short duration, adsorption sites get saturated, and no removal occurs after saturation (Mohan et al., 2019).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Many technologies are available for removing arsenic from water. Various techniques, including oxidation, co‐precipitation, coagulation, adsorption, ion‐exchange, and membrane technologies, have been used for the treatment of contaminated groundwater or surface water (Alka et al., 2021; Hering et al., 2017; Kushwaha et al., 2023; Mohan et al., 2022; Mohanty, 2017; Ng et al., 2004; Nicomel et al., 2016; Thirunavukkarasu et al., 2007). Adsorption has been the most widely employed technique because of its ease of operation, high removal capacity, high adsorption capacity, cost‐effectiveness, safe disposal, and high surface area (Gupta et al., 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%