2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2018.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar photovoltaic power forecasting using optimized modified extreme learning machine technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
84
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy produced by the PV plant is intermittent and is highly dependent on a number of variables, such as solar irradiance, temperature and other atmospheric parameters (e.g., humidity and cloud coverage), as well as age of the equipment and operational condition [64]. According to the literature, there are numerous applications of multiple linear regression (MLR) models for energy production forecasting, such as hourly PV production estimation [65].…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy produced by the PV plant is intermittent and is highly dependent on a number of variables, such as solar irradiance, temperature and other atmospheric parameters (e.g., humidity and cloud coverage), as well as age of the equipment and operational condition [64]. According to the literature, there are numerous applications of multiple linear regression (MLR) models for energy production forecasting, such as hourly PV production estimation [65].…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical power generation data and weather type were processed, and the MSE value was decreased by at least 0.0012 [2]. Behera et al applied an accelerated particle swarm optimization-based extreme learning machine to predict photovoltaic power, and the MAPE accuracy was obtained as 1.4440% [3]. Eseye et al developed a wavelet-particle swarm optimization-support vector machine model based on SCADA data and meteorological information, This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 explains the hybrid prediction models developed for daily photovoltaic power prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solar PV power predictions approaches can be globally classified into model-based and data-driven (Ernst et al, 2009;Almonacid et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2014;Antonanzas et al, 2016;Das et al, 2018;Al-Dahidi et al, 2019). Model-based approaches employ physics-based models that use representative weather variables, e.g., solar radiations, for the predictions of the solar PV power productions (Wan et al, 2015;Behera et al, 2018;Al-Dahidi et al, 2019). Despite the fact that these approaches can lead to accurate prediction results, but simplifications and assumptions in the adopted models impose uncertainty that might pose limitations on their practical implementation (Al-Dahidi et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prediction model based on ELM technique is proposed in Behera et al (2018) combined with Incremental Conductance (IC) Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) technique. Authors introduced different PSO methods to improve prediction accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%