Stable, affordable and sustainable electricity production, transportation and consumption are crucial to the functioning of any modern society. Nowadays, utility providers face technical, environmental, and societal challenges in securing the taken-for-granted services the energy grid is expected to provide to household. The electrification of daily life, especially in the sphere of mobility (EVs) and electrified heating, in combination with the rise of decentralized renewable generation (rooftop solar), places increasing pressure on the electricity distribution grid. This challenge goes together with an unprecedented pressure on the energy sector to reduce its climate impact in the next decades.Smart grids are heralded as promising socio-technical innovation and a comprehensive solution for making the energy grid more flexible and green (Yu et al., 2011;Darby et al., 2013). A smart grid can be defined as "a socio-technical network characterised by the active management of both information and energy flows, in order to control practices of distributed generation, storage, consumption and flexible demand" (Wolsink, 2012, p. 824). Smart grids innovations presume the involvement of householders, who, by conserving, monitoring, and timing their consumption with the help of various smart technologies and information flows, contribute to the sustainability and stability of the electricity grid. To realize flexible grid management and decarbonization as key objectives of smart grids, domestic practices of (energy) consumption will undergo significant change. Without the engagement of householders these changes are unlikely to be achieved.In light of these developments and the maturation of smart grid technologies, policy-makers, technology designers and infrastructure planners are in need for knowledge regarding the factors that determine the specific ways in which householders (co-) shape their everyday life involvement in smart grids (Verbong et al. 2013;Skjølsvold and Lindkvist, 2015; Geelen et al., 2016). In what -both individual and organized -ways, to what extent and with what kind of ideas, moods, values and emotions are householders gradually becoming engaged with the key objectives of smart grid developments? To answer this set of questions, communities of experts, including engineers, grid managers, (social-)psychologists and behavioural economists, have applied different perspectives and methods in the search for pathways towards the social embedding of smart grids in the everyday lives of situated households. So far, technology design, economic modelling and nudging individual behaviours have emerged as core features for
Research aim and research questionsThe following three main research questions underlie the proceeding chapters 2 to 5 and will be answered in concluding Chapter 6.
Complexity of householder agencyAs described in section 1.1, complexities with respect to householder agency in smart grids is found on two (equally important and interrelated) levels: (1) householders' (behavioural) response to ...