2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00703-015-0372-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar radiation and precipitable water modeling for Turkey using artificial neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum RMSE was found to be 2.4002% for Adana station in the testing values, while the best result was found to be 0.3633% for İzmir station in the training values. Moreover, another significant point in this table, the performance values of the training by method are generally better than the performance values of the testing Figure 6 shows a comparison between measured, ANN values for the five stations (training and testing stations) [25]. The results of own study confirms the ability of ANN method to predict solar radiation values at every pixels of the study area, throughout Turkey.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum RMSE was found to be 2.4002% for Adana station in the testing values, while the best result was found to be 0.3633% for İzmir station in the training values. Moreover, another significant point in this table, the performance values of the training by method are generally better than the performance values of the testing Figure 6 shows a comparison between measured, ANN values for the five stations (training and testing stations) [25]. The results of own study confirms the ability of ANN method to predict solar radiation values at every pixels of the study area, throughout Turkey.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Small scale climate stations were unable to make some meteorological atmospheric parameters observation. Using ANN, solar radiation values can be calculated for each such station [25]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than focusing on solar city sites with abundant solar radiation, this study purposely adopts MODIS satellite variables to model GSR since historical data related to the target variable (GSR) play a key role in helping evaluate solar energy availability. Remote sensing data have already been identified as a practical predictor for solar problems [55], so in this view, the coupling of a deep learning model with satellite-derived products is a major improvement over the use of station-based data mainly because the acquisition of satellite imagery can be feasible for inaccessible sites with no measurement infrastructure as long as a footprint is identified. For long-term forecast horizons (e.g., monthly), satellite data remain abundant for a diverse range of spatial and temporal resolutions and, recently, have been adopted in global solar radiation prediction problems [9,13].…”
Section: Deep Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike geometry-based methods, the impact of data resolution has rarely been studied for data-driven approaches that attempt to recognize patterns in the relevant data for the solar radiation prediction. It may be because machine learning methods in the previous studies [e.g., 14,15] generally used solar radiation data (e.g., altitude, latitude, longitude, land surface temperature) produced at observation stations. In this case, the resolution of data may not be of importance for the prediction, as DEM data was not directly used for the modeling process.…”
Section: The Effect Of Data Resolution On Solar Irradiation Predictiomentioning
confidence: 99%