2022
DOI: 10.1111/nph.18120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar radiation drives methane emissions from the shoots of Scots pine

Abstract: Plants are recognized as sources of aerobically produced methane (CH 4 ), but the seasonality, environmental drivers and significance of CH 4 emissions from the canopies of evergreen boreal trees remain poorly understood.We measured the CH 4 fluxes from the shoots of Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine) and Picea abies (Norway spruce) saplings in a static, non-steady-state chamber setup to investigate if the shoots of boreal conifers are a source of CH 4 during spring.We found that the shoots of Scots pine emitted CH… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Trees have been shown to transport and emit soil‐derived CH 4 (Barba, Poyatos, et al, 2019; Covey & Megonigal, 2019; Pitz & Megonigal, 2017; Plain & Epron, 2021) while tree stems may inhabit microbes that produce and consume CH 4 (Jeffrey, Maher, Tait, & Johnston, 2020; Li et al, 2020; Warner et al, 2017; Yip et al, 2019). Consequently, abiotic conditions and biotic processes within tree stems and canopies can contribute to the net CH 4 exchange of forests (Machacova et al, 2016; Putkinen et al, 2021; Sundqvist et al, 2012; Tenhovirta et al, 2022). Tree CH 4 stem fluxes show high variability among different tree species and growing conditions resulting from a combination of production and consumption dynamics and transport processes contributing to net CH 4 fluxes (Barba, Bradford, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Trees have been shown to transport and emit soil‐derived CH 4 (Barba, Poyatos, et al, 2019; Covey & Megonigal, 2019; Pitz & Megonigal, 2017; Plain & Epron, 2021) while tree stems may inhabit microbes that produce and consume CH 4 (Jeffrey, Maher, Tait, & Johnston, 2020; Li et al, 2020; Warner et al, 2017; Yip et al, 2019). Consequently, abiotic conditions and biotic processes within tree stems and canopies can contribute to the net CH 4 exchange of forests (Machacova et al, 2016; Putkinen et al, 2021; Sundqvist et al, 2012; Tenhovirta et al, 2022). Tree CH 4 stem fluxes show high variability among different tree species and growing conditions resulting from a combination of production and consumption dynamics and transport processes contributing to net CH 4 fluxes (Barba, Bradford, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon sequestration of the atmospheric CO 2 into tree biomass and forest soil is among the most important terrestrial carbon sinks, while upland forest soil is also an important sink for atmospheric CH 4 due to microbial CH 4 consumption in the soil (Kirschke et al, 2013;Saunois et al, 2016). Recently observed CH 4 emissions from both tree stems and canopies may offset part of the forest soil CH 4 sink and thus significantly contribute to the CH 4 budget of upland forests (Barba, Poyatos, et al, 2019;Carmichael et al, 2014;Covey & Megonigal, 2019;Machacova et al, 2016;Pangala et al, 2017;Saunois et al, 2016;Tenhovirta et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Methane emission from plants is accelerated by interaction with other stressors such as herbivore damage and high temperatures [ 427 ]. Controlled experiments with Scots pine and Norway spruce under ambient conditions in Finland found a positive relationship between methane emissions and solar radiation, which was steeper at warmer temperatures [ 428 ]. Even then, in most habitats, direct emission from plants through photodegradation of pectin [ 429 ] is considered only a minor contributor to global terrestrial methane emissions [ 421 , 428 ].…”
Section: Effects On Biogeochemical Cycles and Climate Feedbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%