1994
DOI: 10.1626/jcs.63.298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar Radiation Penetration and Distribution in Soybean Communities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since leaf inclination angle is closely related to the plant light-intercepting capabilities, this has been one of the most important parameters for describing canopy geometry (Isoda et al, 1994;Chhina and Kler, 1997). However, it is a laborious task to measure the leaf inclination angle for growing plants in the fi eld.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since leaf inclination angle is closely related to the plant light-intercepting capabilities, this has been one of the most important parameters for describing canopy geometry (Isoda et al, 1994;Chhina and Kler, 1997). However, it is a laborious task to measure the leaf inclination angle for growing plants in the fi eld.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43) In the case of a paddy field, the physical shielding of solar radiation by the canopy of rice leaves becomes more significant with the growth of rice plant, 46) and more shielding was measured after heading, with its extent also dependent on a solar zenith angle. 47,48) Since the photodegradation of pesticide in distilled water (DW) proceeds only via direct photolysis, the involvement of indirect photolysis in natural water can be conveniently evaluated when the light attenuation is minimal, by comparing k direct,p in DW and the observed k photo,p (Eq. 1).…”
Section: Photodegradation Of Pesticidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kokubun and Watanabe (1981) found that artificial raising of leaves increased light penetration into the canopy and improved yields under the low light intensity condition. Differences in canopy structure are evident among soybean cultivars, such as in the distribution of leaves inside the canopy (Isoda et al, 1994) and in leaflet size and orientation (Blad and Baker, 1972). A canopy with smaller leaves and a smaller leaf area in the upper canopy is advantageous for light transmission and distribution (Isoda et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in canopy structure are evident among soybean cultivars, such as in the distribution of leaves inside the canopy (Isoda et al, 1994) and in leaflet size and orientation (Blad and Baker, 1972). A canopy with smaller leaves and a smaller leaf area in the upper canopy is advantageous for light transmission and distribution (Isoda et al, 1994). Therefore, the broad, horizontal leaflets of 'Misato-zairai' may block light transmission and distribution and may be responsible for the unstable yields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%