2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar radiation prediction using different techniques: model evaluation and comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first tendency reflects the problems of underestimation for high values of CO 2 flux in training and testing data sets, which is general in statistical prediction models [24,45]. Because the inputs cannot totally explain the outputs especially for extreme values, this tendency can also partly attribute to the non-homogeneous nature of data.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results Obtained By Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first tendency reflects the problems of underestimation for high values of CO 2 flux in training and testing data sets, which is general in statistical prediction models [24,45]. Because the inputs cannot totally explain the outputs especially for extreme values, this tendency can also partly attribute to the non-homogeneous nature of data.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results Obtained By Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches have been developed to estimate surface solar radiation accurately (Khatib et al, ; Liu et al, ; Olatomiwa et al, ; Sun et al, ; Wang et al, ; Zhang et al, ), which can be generally categorized as follows: Estimation by semiempirical and semiphysical formulae with conventional meteorological parameters (e.g., sunshine hour, cloud, temperature, and humidity) as inputs (Angstrom, ; Davies et al, ; Thornton & Running, ; Bakirci, ; Besharat et al, ; Hassan et al, ; Liu et al, ). A simple empirical model can be established with its coefficients varying with time and space, which need to be calibrated using long‐term radiation observation data in certain areas. Estimation by the artificial neural network method with meteorological observations (Jiang, ; Linares‐Rodriguez et al, ; Tang et al, ; Ramedani et al, ; Kashyap et al, ; Wang et al, ). The artificial neural network method requires a large number of samples to train the model in a local area, and the trained model may not be applicable in other areas. Retrieval by satellite‐based radiation (Ceballos, ; Liang et al, ; Mueller et al, ; Lu et al, ; Huang et al, ; Qin et al, ; Ma & Pinker, ; Jia et al, ; Zhang et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MLPs are organized as hierarchical networks with several layers including an input layer, hidden layer (s) and an output layer (Wang et al, 2016). There are one or more hidden layers between the input and output layers which are connected by neurons (including synaptic weights, biases and activation or transfer functions).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%