2022
DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2022.2053081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soldiers in the garden: managing the US military training landscape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may seem to conflict with MSVMs' desire for a protected environment, but an enclosed space with fenced boundaries can also have open lines of sight. An understanding of the MSVM's thought process, training, and prospect-refuge theory could offer some explanation [25,50]. Military members have been taught to read a landscape during their training and determine if there could possibly be a threat within the area they occupy [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This may seem to conflict with MSVMs' desire for a protected environment, but an enclosed space with fenced boundaries can also have open lines of sight. An understanding of the MSVM's thought process, training, and prospect-refuge theory could offer some explanation [25,50]. Military members have been taught to read a landscape during their training and determine if there could possibly be a threat within the area they occupy [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An understanding of the MSVM's thought process, training, and prospect-refuge theory could offer some explanation [25,50]. Military members have been taught to read a landscape during their training and determine if there could possibly be a threat within the area they occupy [25]. MSVMs' choice of the prospective view may indicate MSVMs are not comfortable with seeing enclosed spots because of what could possibly be within the enclosed area [17,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bauch, 2015; Bolland, 2015; Doel, 2019; Ebbensgaard, 2017; Rich, 2017; Rush-Cooper, 2020; Nordström, 2017; Wylie and Webster, 2019), agenda setting military and nuclear landscape work (e.g. Rabung and Toman, 2022; Pitkanen and Farish, 2018; Woodward, 2013), and research in post-industrial and post-World War II landscapes (e.g. Humphris and Rauws, 2021; Braae et al, 2021; Van der Schriek, 2020).…”
Section: Grounding the New Materials Landscapes Of Powermentioning
confidence: 99%