2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-08068-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid Earth change and the evolution of the Antarctic Ice Sheet

Abstract: Recent studies suggest that Antarctica has the potential to contribute up to ~15 m of sea-level rise over the next few centuries. The evolution of the Antarctic Ice Sheet is driven by a combination of climate forcing and non-climatic feedbacks. In this review we focus on feedbacks between the Antarctic Ice Sheet and the solid Earth, and the role of these feedbacks in shaping the response of the ice sheet to past and future climate changes. The growth and decay of the Antarctic Ice Sheet reshapes the solid Eart… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
154
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
(244 reference statements)
5
154
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of Neogene fossils at Site 1 therefore implies deeper glacial erosion than at the other sites, with ongoing unroofing and removal of younger strata. Because Miocene and younger marine strata must have accumulated there during periods of reduced ice, the lack of young fossils implies significantly more uplift at Site 1 than the others; a conclusion consistent with tectonic interpretations (Whitehouse et al, 2019;Winberry & Anandakrishnan, 2004;Begeman et al, 2017;Nield et al, 2018;Barletta et al, 2018;Fisher et al, 2015;Spiegel et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The absence of Neogene fossils at Site 1 therefore implies deeper glacial erosion than at the other sites, with ongoing unroofing and removal of younger strata. Because Miocene and younger marine strata must have accumulated there during periods of reduced ice, the lack of young fossils implies significantly more uplift at Site 1 than the others; a conclusion consistent with tectonic interpretations (Whitehouse et al, 2019;Winberry & Anandakrishnan, 2004;Begeman et al, 2017;Nield et al, 2018;Barletta et al, 2018;Fisher et al, 2015;Spiegel et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Additionally, the Marie Byrd Land region has a higher uplift potential as a result of a thinner crust with a low viscosity, responsive mantle (Whitehouse et al, 2019) likely influenced by an inferred mantle plume (Winberry & Anandakrishnan, 2004;Begeman et al, 2017;Nield et al, 2018;Barletta et al, 2018;Fisher et al, 2015). Spiegel et al (2016) suggest the uplift arising from plume activity occurred~20 Ma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GIA model predictions of present-day uplift rates across the WS sector vary significantly in both spatial pattern and magnitude (Whitehouse et al, 2019). The majority of models predict maximum present-day uplift rates in the region of the HIR, KIR, and BIR, with predicted rates peaking at >10 mm/year (Argus et al, 2014;Whitehouse, Bentley, Milne, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Modelling and Plausible Ice Sheet Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a significant limitation of this approach, aside from the uncertainty associated with climate forcing, is the need to know the correct Earth rheology. Upper mantle viscosity across Antarctica is thought to vary by >3 orders of magnitude (Hay et al, 2017;van der Wal et al, 2015;Whitehouse et al, 2019). The associated range in mantle relaxation times significantly perturbs the strength of the feedback between isostatic deformation and ice dynamics in different regions of Antarctica (Gomez et al, 2015;Konrad et al, 2015;Pollard et al, 2017) and motivates the need for a coupled ice sheet-GIA model that incorporates 3-D Earth structure.…”
Section: Modelling and Plausible Ice Sheet Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%