1976
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(76)85019-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid-liquid contacting effectiveness in trickle bed reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
89
1
6

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
89
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…s (Columbo et al, 1976;Sicardi et al, 1980;Dudukovic and Mills, 1986). Average catalyst particle size was about 500 pm, eliminating internal diffusion and film mass transfer effects based on calculations given above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…s (Columbo et al, 1976;Sicardi et al, 1980;Dudukovic and Mills, 1986). Average catalyst particle size was about 500 pm, eliminating internal diffusion and film mass transfer effects based on calculations given above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The vent gas was discharged down to atmospheric pressure by a pressure regulator and analyzed online by a gas chromatograph equipped with a TCD. In order to ensure complete wetting of the catalyst, the liquid rate in this study was maintained at 2.0 mL·min −1 [13]- [15]. About 10 g of catalyst was loaded in the reactor.…”
Section: Experimental Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetic model for the reaction was based on a first-order reaction according to the equation below [6]:…”
Section: Mathematical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%