1988
DOI: 10.1002/9780470122693.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid‐Liquid Phase Behavior in Microclusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For finite systems in the microcanonical ensemble T K differs by O(N −1 ) from the thermodynamic definition of temperature (Allen and Tildesley 1987). An average of T K over a short time interval has been found to serve as a useful order parameter to distinguish between phase-like forms of clusters (Berry et al 1988) and is used in section 5 to elucidate the melting behaviour of M 55 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For finite systems in the microcanonical ensemble T K differs by O(N −1 ) from the thermodynamic definition of temperature (Allen and Tildesley 1987). An average of T K over a short time interval has been found to serve as a useful order parameter to distinguish between phase-like forms of clusters (Berry et al 1988) and is used in section 5 to elucidate the melting behaviour of M 55 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we shall illustrate the effects of the range of the potential on cluster thermodynamics in more detail, by presenting results of simulations of M 55 at different values of the range parameter, ρ 0 . Much work has been done on the simulation of clusters, particularly Lennard-Jones clusters (Berry et al 1988). One focus of these studies has been the character of the melting transition.…”
Section: Thermodynamics Of M 55mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their low coordination number and the greater degree of freedom in their motions, surface atoms have higher mobility than atoms in the bulk. The latter fact makes the melting temperature of the surface atoms even lower than that of the core atoms of a nanoparticle, causing the phenomenon of surface melting, or “surface premelting”, as designated by Bachels, or “dynamic coexistence melting”, by Alavi et al From extensive studies of phase transitions in small clusters, Berry et al concluded that there exists a finite range of temperatures over which solidlike and liquidlike clusters can coexist in equilibrium. A very interesting case of phase coexistence in nanoparticles is that of gallium, with coexistence of melted surfaces and solid core over a broad range of temperature from 180 to 800 K. The materials were reported as “neither solid nor liquid” .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Theoretical modeling has also contributed a great deal to the understanding of the structural evolution of nanoparticles, including the solid–liquid phase behavior in microclusters, the existence of a quasi-melting regime in small particles, the liquid skin nucleation model of melting, the role of bond order deficiency on the size-dependent melting of nanoparticles, the amorphization of nanoparticles, , their melting and freezing, and their morphological transitions. For more information on these aspects, the reader may refer to the review articles of Baletto, Barnard, and Marks …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The onset of melting in the cluster is therefore related to the occurrence of frequent passages through the potential minima wells associated to the possible stable isomers. 1,[19][20][21] The notion of phase transitions in very small clusters, however, contradicts the seemingly well accepted dogma which requires systems to possess a large number of particles to show a true sharp phase change. 22 This issue has been discussed, for three-atom systems, with analogs between phases and energy localization modes in a molecule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%