2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.greeac.2022.100048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid phase microextraction for quantitative analysis – Expectations beyond design?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical analyses for peaks that met these criteria were performed using R Studio (version 1.3.1093). Quantitation of absolute amounts of compounds in SPME samples can be problematic ( Nolvachai et al 2023 ), so quantitative analyses of each peak were performed on the area of that peak expressed as a percentage of the total areas of all peaks in the sample. The Best Normalize package ( Peterson 2021 ) was used to identify transformations, almost always OrderNorm ( Peterson and Cavanaugh 2020 ), that met the assumptions of normality and heteroscedasticity required in the following analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical analyses for peaks that met these criteria were performed using R Studio (version 1.3.1093). Quantitation of absolute amounts of compounds in SPME samples can be problematic ( Nolvachai et al 2023 ), so quantitative analyses of each peak were performed on the area of that peak expressed as a percentage of the total areas of all peaks in the sample. The Best Normalize package ( Peterson 2021 ) was used to identify transformations, almost always OrderNorm ( Peterson and Cavanaugh 2020 ), that met the assumptions of normality and heteroscedasticity required in the following analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This green technique offers several advantages, such as simplicity, low cost, drastic solvent reduction, and improved accuracy, so it was successfully used in various analytical applications. The original design of the device involved a syringe equipped with a fiber coated with a suitable sorbent phase, and several improvements have been made to this technique [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. In addition, SPME provides two different extraction methods: the direct immersion mode (DI-SPME), where the fiber is fully submersed in the aqueous phase, and the headspace mode (HS-SPME), by placing the fiber in the space above the sample [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun et al [26] reviewed research associated with different sample preparation methods, such as steam distillation [17,27], simultaneous distillation extraction [25], dynamic [18] and static [19] headspace, direct thermal desorption [21], direct microwave desorption [28], liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) [29], stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) [23], and headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) applied to hop [22,30]. This last method attracts attention as being a "greener" approach since it is a solventless technique using sorptive polymeric fibres, is simple, versatile, and has a wide applications base, with SPME reported for samples in the environmental industry, food, drugs, and other areas, although the quantitative application of SPME is rather complex [22,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%