2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2006.12.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid-phase synthesis of core 3 and core 6 O-glycan-linked glycopeptides by benzyl-protection method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trisaccharide was designed as the suitably protected form equipped with TBDPS group on the 1-position of the glucosamine and an allyl group on the 3-position of the galactose for divergent synthesis of the acceptor and the donor. In addition, the trichloroacetyl (TCA) group on the 2-position of the glucosamine and the benzyl groups were expected to ensure high stereoselectivity and high yield during the later glycosylation [4,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. We envisioned that the tetramer could be obtained by glycosylation promoted by a catalytic Lewis acid with haxasaccharyl acceptor and donor, which could be prepared from the hexasaccharide Le a dimer, and the hexasaccharide could be synthesized by coupling the acceptor and N-phenyl trichloroacetimidyl donor provided from the Le a trisaccharide common intermediate (Scheme 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trisaccharide was designed as the suitably protected form equipped with TBDPS group on the 1-position of the glucosamine and an allyl group on the 3-position of the galactose for divergent synthesis of the acceptor and the donor. In addition, the trichloroacetyl (TCA) group on the 2-position of the glucosamine and the benzyl groups were expected to ensure high stereoselectivity and high yield during the later glycosylation [4,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. We envisioned that the tetramer could be obtained by glycosylation promoted by a catalytic Lewis acid with haxasaccharyl acceptor and donor, which could be prepared from the hexasaccharide Le a dimer, and the hexasaccharide could be synthesized by coupling the acceptor and N-phenyl trichloroacetimidyl donor provided from the Le a trisaccharide common intermediate (Scheme 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] Although syntheses of these specific core 3 & core 4-type methyl glycosides have not been previously reported, the synthesis of related core 3 & core 4 derivatives has been investigated by several groups using both chemical and chemoenzymatic approaches. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Prior syntheses have been primarily focused on generating glycosylated amino acid derivatives for solid-phase peptide synthesis of glycopep-tide mucin mimetics. An advantage of the methyl glycoside derivatives is that they are inherently more stable than glycopeptide derivatives, therefore facilitating the assembly of more complex glycan structures from purely chemical methods, as well as enabling more diverse and/or forceful reaction conditions to improve scalability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been successfully used for the synthesis of various glycopeptides and glycoproteins. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The benzyl protection strategy for the carbohydrate moiety has several advantages over the more common acetyl protection strategy: (1) the benzyl-protected sugars usually retain higher reactivity during the glycosylation reactions, which is useful for the construction of complex sugar chains; (2) the benzyl groups are stable under the basic conditions used for the Fmoc-SPPS, which is free from side reactions, such as acyl migration from the carbohydrate to the terminal amino group of the growing peptide chain; and (3) the cleavage of the benzyl group does not require the alkaline conditions, such as NaOMe treatment, which have the potential danger of racemization of amino acid residues and β-elimination of the carbohydrate moiety. Instead, the complexity of this method is that a two-step deprotection is required at the end of the Fmoc-SPPS as follows: (1) TFA treatment to deprotect the peptide portion and (2) the Low-TfOH [17] treatment to deprotect the carbohydrate chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%