2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid-state tap-changer of transformers: Design, control and implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a mechanical tap changer, at least 20 cycles are required for measuring the RMS value of the bus voltage due to the delay time of the low‐pass filter. At first glance, the OLTC can mitigate the temporary voltages’ sag or swell but the mechanical parts of OLTC do not provide that because it has a specific taps number before malfunction [20]. Therefore, the operation time of high/MV OLTC is 30 s and operation time of MV/LV OLTC is 60 s [21].…”
Section: Voltage‐violation Mitigation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a mechanical tap changer, at least 20 cycles are required for measuring the RMS value of the bus voltage due to the delay time of the low‐pass filter. At first glance, the OLTC can mitigate the temporary voltages’ sag or swell but the mechanical parts of OLTC do not provide that because it has a specific taps number before malfunction [20]. Therefore, the operation time of high/MV OLTC is 30 s and operation time of MV/LV OLTC is 60 s [21].…”
Section: Voltage‐violation Mitigation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to detect the zero crossing frequently for measurement and tapping. The other drawbacks of solid‐state devices are high conduction loss, high cost, the need for snubber circuit, and a proper protection equipment [20].…”
Section: Voltage‐violation Mitigation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is carried out keeping all transformers in the same tap position. In [17], the authors proposed an OLTC with solid-state tap-changer using power electronics. Results showed reduction in frictional losses, size of components and operation cost; nevertheless, solid-state tap changer components are more expensive in comparison with mechanical OLTC currently used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While electromechanical OLTCs perform toadjacent-tap change in 2-10 s [8], solid-state OLTCs can do a tap-change in a half period of the fundamental frequency [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%