2018
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201809120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid‐State Umbrella‐type Inversion of a VO5 Square‐Pyramidal Unit in a Bowl‐type Dodecavanadate Induced by Insertion and Elimination of a Guest Molecule

Abstract: This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to molybdates and tungstates, which are typically based on [MoO 6 ]/[WO 6 ] octahedra as fundamental building units, POVs show more structural flexibility and feature tetrahedral [VO 4 ], square‐pyramidal [VO 5 ], and octahedral [VO 6 ] coordination modes [21, 27] . However, this coordinative versatility can also facilitate structural rearrangements, which needs to be considered when deploying POVs in energy applications [27, 40–43] . In addition, POVs are often described as being “less stable” than tungstates and molybdates, which is most likely due to a combination of their structural flexibility, complex protonation chemistry, and high redox activity [21, 23, 27] …”
Section: Fundamentals Of Polyoxovanadate Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to molybdates and tungstates, which are typically based on [MoO 6 ]/[WO 6 ] octahedra as fundamental building units, POVs show more structural flexibility and feature tetrahedral [VO 4 ], square‐pyramidal [VO 5 ], and octahedral [VO 6 ] coordination modes [21, 27] . However, this coordinative versatility can also facilitate structural rearrangements, which needs to be considered when deploying POVs in energy applications [27, 40–43] . In addition, POVs are often described as being “less stable” than tungstates and molybdates, which is most likely due to a combination of their structural flexibility, complex protonation chemistry, and high redox activity [21, 23, 27] …”
Section: Fundamentals Of Polyoxovanadate Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Im Gegensatz zu Molybdaten und Wolframaten, die typischerweise auf [MoO 6 ]/[WO 6 ]‐Oktaedern aufbauen, zeigen POVs größere strukturelle Flexibilität und besitzen tetraedrische [VO 4 ], quadratisch‐pyramidale [VO 5 ] und oktaedrische [VO 6 ] Koordionationsgeometrien [21, 27] . Diese koordinative Vielfalt kann jedoch auch strukturelle Umlagerungen bedingen, die beim Einsatz von POVs in Energieanwendungen berücksichtigt werden müssen [27, 40–43] . Zudem werden POVs häufig als “weniger stabil” im Vergleich zu Wolframaten und Molybdaten beschrieben, was wohl auf eine Kombination ihrer strukturellen Flexibilität, ihrer komplexen Protonierungschemie und ihrer ausgeprägten Redoxchemie zurückzuführen ist [21, 23, 27] …”
Section: Grundlagen Der Polyoxovanadat‐chemieunclassified
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12] As an important group of POM-MOCs, the chemistry of polyoxovanadate-based MOCs (POV-MOCs) has experienced rapid development over the past decades. 8,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] According to the nature of organic ligands, POV-MOCs can be roughly divided into two sub-categories, namely, polycarboxylate-based POV-MOCs (POV-C-MOCs) [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] and organo-phosphonate/arsonate-based POV-MOCs (POV-P/As-MOCs). 15,33 Both of them possess addenda of variable valent states (V III , V IV , and V V ) accompanied by flexible coordination geometries (square pyramid and octahedron).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%