2015
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201500992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid‐Supported Iodonium Salts for Fluorinations

Abstract: Solid‐supported iodonium salt precursors have been prepared and used for the production of fluoroarenes. The importance of the resin functionality for the attachment of the iodonium salt moieties has been demonstrated. Furthermore, the production of new iodonium salt precursors for fluorination has been achieved by an alternative and improved method with respect to those previously described. The successful radiofluorination of a simple solid‐supported precursor with no‐carrier‐added (n.c.a.) [18F]fluoride sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some of those precursors have, at this stage of their development, physicochemical properties that make them less suited than others for automated and cGMP productions of PET tracers. Iodonium salts, for their part, have repeatedly been shown to be efficient and stable late-stage radiofluorination precursors from their first reported [ 18 F]-radiolabeling in 1995, which prompted us to develop such an iodonium-based precursor for the one-step radiosynthesis of [ 18 F] 7 . To this day, little information has been made available on the routine, high-activity [ 18 F]-labeling of iodonium salts in the framework of cGMP productions; filling that gap was also one of the objectives of this project. We also tackled what may have represented a major drawback of iodonium [ 18 F]-radiolabelings in a cGMP perspective, which is the use of the genotoxic radical scavenger TEMPO ((2,2,6,6-tetramethyl­piperidin-1-yl)­oxy) for controlling the radical side reactions occurring during the radiolabeling and increasing the yield and reproducibility thereof. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some of those precursors have, at this stage of their development, physicochemical properties that make them less suited than others for automated and cGMP productions of PET tracers. Iodonium salts, for their part, have repeatedly been shown to be efficient and stable late-stage radiofluorination precursors from their first reported [ 18 F]-radiolabeling in 1995, which prompted us to develop such an iodonium-based precursor for the one-step radiosynthesis of [ 18 F] 7 . To this day, little information has been made available on the routine, high-activity [ 18 F]-labeling of iodonium salts in the framework of cGMP productions; filling that gap was also one of the objectives of this project. We also tackled what may have represented a major drawback of iodonium [ 18 F]-radiolabelings in a cGMP perspective, which is the use of the genotoxic radical scavenger TEMPO ((2,2,6,6-tetramethyl­piperidin-1-yl)­oxy) for controlling the radical side reactions occurring during the radiolabeling and increasing the yield and reproducibility thereof. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these methods have been a primary driving force for the utilization of diaryl­iodonium salts in novel arylation reactions, direct access to diaryl­iodonium salts incorporating other counteranions are relatively limited. Specifically, although diaryl­iodonium trifluoro­acetates are useful salts in their own right, we were surprised to find that a well-established synthesis from aryl iodides has not been reported, , although they are suggested as intermediates in the synthesis of diaryl­iodonium triflates with trifluoro­acetic acid as solvent. , Given empirical evidence for the importance of counteranion identity on reactivity, the development of methods that deliver diaryl­iodonium trifluoro­acetates directly, without recourse to anion exchange, would enable reaction development with these reagents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These modifications could explain the lower yield obtained (36 %) compared to the reported procedure (63 %). Alternatively, to this time‐consuming and relatively complex one‐pot reaction, we turned our attention to the recent development described by Wirth and co‐workers for solid‐supported synthesis of iodonium salts. This strategy required the synthesis of trimethylstannane 7 from aryl iodine derivative 4 using hexamethylditin and Pd(PPh 3 ) 4 as catalyst.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%