Solidaritization as a Social Phenomenon and Social Process: Regional Context

Vavilina, N. D.

doi:10.1134/s2079970520030144

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Всякая трактовка солидарности предполагает «взаимную симпатию, сопереживание социальных акторов» (А. Б. Гофман) [11, с. 173], проявление активного сочувствия и поддержки (Н. Д. Вавилина) [46] интересов, мнения «сограждан, коллег, близких людей, единодушия с ними» (Б. В. Заливанский, Е. В. Самохвалова, И. Голикова) [48]. Возвращаясь к истокам партикулярной солидарности в российском обществе, интересно отметить обнаружение А. Блюмом и Б. Меспуле того, что узы дружбы больше, чем профессиональные, связывали бывших ссыльных работников земских администраций и статистиков, врачей и учителей.…”

Section: общность чувствunclassified

Russian sociologists on the foundations of solidarity: subjectivity, predictability and common feelings

Sirazetdinova

2024

Vestnik Instituta Sotziologii

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Each concept of solidarity emphasises certain grounds and factors of solidarisation of society, linking them to social changes or, on the contrary, to the constants of human existence. In periods of social change, not only a decrease or increase in the degree of social consolidation takes place, but also a weakening of some forms of solidarity and the formation of others. The purpose of this study is to identify the bases of solidarity related to sociality and anthropological parameters of being. Although forms of solidarity change from society to society and at different historical stages of their development, no society remains viable and progressive in the absence of solidarity. The present study of the foundations of solidarity goes beyond both traditional sociological concepts of integration and disintegration, of normal society and anomie, and psychological theories of group needs and self-expression, that describe only the immediate preconditions and effects of solidarity. The author relies on secondary analysis of sources and theoretical analysis of sociological concepts of sociality and social reproduction. The research materials include publications by Russian scholars from the 19th century, when the first concepts of sobornost', omnipresence and positivist-practical interpretations of solidarity emerged in Russian sociology, to the present day, devoted to the issues of conditions for the formation of solidarity, consolidation and deconsolidation of society. The author identifies explicitly and implicitly present in the sources of understanding about the foundations of solidarity related to the constants of human existence and sociality: subjectivity, predictability and commonality of feelings. The subjectivity of social actors as the highest, reflexive level of subjectivity determines their ability and will to social creativity and actions in favour of the social whole. The predictability of the social environment ensures the majority's adherence to acceptable common rules, belief in common values on the basis of mutual trust and justice. Mutual aid and altruism within solidarity communities are considered as impossible without the third foundation of solidarity - the community of feelings of social subjects, associated with the commonality of their life worlds.

show abstract

Section: общность чувствunclassified

Russian sociologists on the foundations of solidarity: subjectivity, predictability and common feelings

Sirazetdinova

2024

Vestnik Instituta Sotziologii

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Этот выбор обусловлен традиционным научным интересом авторов и других специалистов Новосибирского государственного университета архитектуры, дизайна и искусств им. А. Д. Крячкова (НГУАДИ) к проблемам поведения и удовлетворенности жителей сибирских городов, к социально-культурной проблематике городских пространств [8][9][10]. Кроме того, у авторов есть некоторое несогласие с выводами всероссийского исследования.…”

unclassified

Creative capital of Siberian cities

Vavilina¹,

Parshukova²,

Parshukova³

2021

проект байкал

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article considers sociological theoretical approaches to the understanding of creative capital as a resource for the development of urban economies. It features methodological approaches to sociological research. The data of comparative analysis of the creative capital of Krasnoyarsk and Novosibirsk are presented. The comparative analysis was carried out on the materials of real sociological research conducted in 2020 according to a common methodology for determining a quota sample. The study was carried out on the basis of a quota sample of the city population aged 18 and over. The reliability of the data obtained was ± 3,5 %. The authors make a conclusion that there are differences in the nature of creative capital in Krasnoyarsk and Novosibirsk. This fact should condition different strategies for the development of creative industries for these cities.

show abstract

Solidaritization as a Social Phenomenon and Social Process: Regional Context

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Russian sociologists on the foundations of solidarity: subjectivity, predictability and common feelings

Russian sociologists on the foundations of solidarity: subjectivity, predictability and common feelings

Creative capital of Siberian cities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About