Solidarity Reasoning and Citizenship Agendas: From Socialist Yugoslavia to Neoliberal Serbia

Abstract

Solidarity and citizenship are intertwined in a very complex manner, where the former usually operates as the “social glue” for the latter, holding together its formal components such as rights, duties, and membership criteria. The “we” that sets the parameters for membership and equality is not only legally defined but also discursively produced and maintained. Here, the rhetoric of solidarity plays an important yet ambiguous role, as it can advocate for interdependence and full inclusion while at the same time solidifying the exclusionary “we.” The aim of this article is to show how solidarity reasoning—the question of with whom we should be solidary and why—plays a functional role in maintaining citizenship agendas, and how this reasoning changes to support and enable shifts in these agendas. The dominant solidarity narratives that have supported prevailing citizenship agendas in Serbia (and across the post-Yugoslav space) over the last couple of decades will be discussed, as will counter-narratives that have served to destabilize hegemonic agendas by envisioning citizenship communities differently. Today, the ambiguous role solidarity can play within a citizenship agenda becomes especially obvious in neoliberal regimes, where, as I will show in the case of contemporary Serbia, calls for solidarity can be deployed to foster very distinct, arguably mutually opposing, kinds of political subjectivities and citizen activism.

I’d Rather Bite My Tongue Off Than Stand with Them: Paralysis of Political Engagement in Serbia

“…The perception of politics as intrinsically corrupt and morally questionable often results in a passive attitude towards political involvement, the proliferation of anti-political sentiments, and a general reluctance to take political action. To address the paralysis of political engagement and encourage active participation among citizens, one potential approach is to shift the discourse from moral considerations to values of solidarity and empathy, as suggested by Vasiljević (2021) and Ilić (2014). Conversely, maintaining moral integrity and motivation would not inherently deter political involvement if the perception of politics as inherently immoral could be overcome.…”

Functions of (Illegal) Nightlife for Youth during the Pandemic: Between Neoliberalism and Neotribalism

“…Funkcije noćnih izlazaka za mlade kroz prizmu neoliberalizma i neotribalizma Noćni život, njegova svrha i značaj određeni su i širim društvenim uticajima. S obzirom da je neoliberalizam dominantna ideologija našeg savremenog društva (Mikuš 2016;Vasiljević 2021;Harvey 2007), ona se postavlja kao polazna tačka na osnovu koje možemo da produbimo razumevanje funkcija žurki za mlade. Ipak, pošto je neoliberalna ideologija po svojoj prirodi individualistička, a noćni izlasci predstavljaju neki vid savremenih kolektivističkih praksi i "ri-S J…”

“Бирократските Интеракции И Колективните Сеќавања За Социјалистичка Југославија”

“…Еве ако веќе не ти ги овозможило основните услови да функционираат. 9 Пристапувајќи кон "граѓанските агенди" (Vasiljević 2020) низ призма на солидарноста, во денешните југоносталгични критики се укажува на недостиг на солидарност од државата, односно еднострано очекување на придонес од страна на граѓаните кон неа, но без возврат. "Морална ерозија направена... од осамостојувањето" е описот на една соговорничка во таа смисла.…”