1997
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans1989.38.553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solidification and Structural Characteristics of &alpha;(Al)&ndash;Mg<SUB>2</SUB>Si Eutectic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Resulting values of K LSW and K GBD are, respectively, factors of 2 to 4 ϫ 10 3 and 3 ϫ 10 5 below their corresponding values obtained experimentally (Table I), indicating that neither solute diffusion through the ␣-Al crystal lattice nor along its grain boundaries can account for the observed rates of coarsening of Mg 2 Si in this alloy at 590 °C. A further possibility arises from the proximity of 590 °C to the solidus temperature (ϳ620 °C according to the phase diagram "typical" [5] 0.28 [6] Mg 38.3 2.0 ϫ 10 Ϫ5 1.0 [7] of a 6XXX alloy reproduced by the authors in their article), and the authors' own suggestion that the "classical phase diagram" may be in error. Let us suppose that 590 °C is sufficiently high to cause at least partial melting,* which will *Bäckerud et al [12] report solidification reactions down to 531/536 °C for 6030 and 6351 alloys, which straddle the composition of 6105.…”
Section: H Jonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resulting values of K LSW and K GBD are, respectively, factors of 2 to 4 ϫ 10 3 and 3 ϫ 10 5 below their corresponding values obtained experimentally (Table I), indicating that neither solute diffusion through the ␣-Al crystal lattice nor along its grain boundaries can account for the observed rates of coarsening of Mg 2 Si in this alloy at 590 °C. A further possibility arises from the proximity of 590 °C to the solidus temperature (ϳ620 °C according to the phase diagram "typical" [5] 0.28 [6] Mg 38.3 2.0 ϫ 10 Ϫ5 1.0 [7] of a 6XXX alloy reproduced by the authors in their article), and the authors' own suggestion that the "classical phase diagram" may be in error. Let us suppose that 590 °C is sufficiently high to cause at least partial melting,* which will *Bäckerud et al [12] report solidification reactions down to 531/536 °C for 6030 and 6351 alloys, which straddle the composition of 6105.…”
Section: H Jonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature gradient can then influence the eutectic spacings. The influence of temperature gradient on the eutectic spacings was investigated by several authors [28][29][30][31][32]. The variations of rod spacings ( T , L and e ) with temperature gradient (G) at a constant V (6.80 m/s) are given in Table 1 and shown in Fig.…”
Section: The Effect Of Temperature Gradient On the Rod Spacingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that the effect of tem- perature gradient (G) on lamellar spacing (λ) cannot be ignored. Several authors have reported that the influence of temperature gradient on lamellar spacing [13][14][15][16]. The research of Ç adırlı et al [16] indicates that an increase in temperature gradient leads to decrease in lamellar spacing for a given constant solidification rate, and λ and G have the relationship of λ = kG −0.37 L .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%