2003
DOI: 10.1209/epl/i2003-00442-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soliton-dynamical approach to a noisy Ginzburg-Landau model

Abstract: We present a dynamical description and analysis of non-equilibrium transitions in the noisy Ginzburg-Landau equation based on a canonical phase space formulation. The transition pathways are characterized by nucleation and subsequent propagation of domain walls or solitons. We also evaluate the Arrhenius factor in terms of an associated action and find good agreement with recent numerical optimization studies.PACS numbers: 05.45.Yv,64.60.Qb, 75.60.Jk Phenomena far from equilibrium are widespread including t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here the analysis, corroborating recent numerical optimization studies, is simpler because the soliton excitations are topological and have a fixed amplitude [59].…”
Section: A Correlations In the Edwards-wilkinson Casesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Here the analysis, corroborating recent numerical optimization studies, is simpler because the soliton excitations are topological and have a fixed amplitude [59].…”
Section: A Correlations In the Edwards-wilkinson Casesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…See also an application to a nonlinear finite-time-singularity model in Refs. [91,92] and to an extended system, the noise-driven Ginzburg-Landau model, in Refs [93,94].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In higher d the scaling results based on the weak noise method are still subject to scrutiny. Finally, we mention that the weak noise method has also been applied to the noise-driven Ginzburg-Landau equation, a finite-time-singularity model, and DNA bubble dynamics [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%