1990
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.59.1047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soliton Lattice Modulation of Incommensurate Spin Density Wave in Two Dimensional Hubbard Model -A Mean Field Study-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
159
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
159
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The essentially identical modulation and doping dependence of ǫ was observed in superconducting crystals of LSCO with x > 0.05. Conversely, experiments on LSNO established that spin order is characterized by the wave vectors Q s = π(1 ± ǫ, 1 ± ǫ) with ǫ ≃ x for x < 1/3, corresponding to a constant charge of one hole/Ni ion along a diagonal DW, in agreement with the predictions made in the pioneering works by Zaanen and Gunnarsson 19 and others, 20,21,22,23 and emphasized recently, 24 which predicted theoretically the stripe order. More precisely, neutron scattering measurements have revealed static stripe order in the LNO samples with δ = 0.105, 0.125, as well as 0.133, 25,26,27,28,29,30,31 and even over a wider hole doping regime 0.135 ≤ x ≤ 0.5 in the case of LSNO.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The essentially identical modulation and doping dependence of ǫ was observed in superconducting crystals of LSCO with x > 0.05. Conversely, experiments on LSNO established that spin order is characterized by the wave vectors Q s = π(1 ± ǫ, 1 ± ǫ) with ǫ ≃ x for x < 1/3, corresponding to a constant charge of one hole/Ni ion along a diagonal DW, in agreement with the predictions made in the pioneering works by Zaanen and Gunnarsson 19 and others, 20,21,22,23 and emphasized recently, 24 which predicted theoretically the stripe order. More precisely, neutron scattering measurements have revealed static stripe order in the LNO samples with δ = 0.105, 0.125, as well as 0.133, 25,26,27,28,29,30,31 and even over a wider hole doping regime 0.135 ≤ x ≤ 0.5 in the case of LSNO.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, reduced |m π (l x )| at those sites allows the system to better optimize the kinetic energy gain which then overcompensates a large on-site energy only when the optimal filling is close to one hole per Ni site, meaning that for a given doping level, the DWs should be separated by a larger distance as compared to predictions made in the DDH model. On the other hand, the robust stability of the DBC stripe phases with respect the VBC ones can be understood as following from a stronger reduction of all double occupancies (20)- (22) in the former phase. In fact, the doubly occupied configurations cannot be then excited between the nearest neighbor DW sites, leading to a lower total energy.…”
Section: B Double Occupancy Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On doping layered transition-metal-oxide antiferromagnets with holes, it is possible for a stripe phase to develop, with the holes segregating into charge stripes that form antiphase domain walls between antiferromagnetic strips [4][5][6][7] . While the original proposals for the stripe phase focused on the ordered state [8][9][10] , it has been proposed that fluctuating order of this type ('dynamic charge stripes') plays a key role in the physics of various interesting, strongly correlated electronic materials 4,[11][12][13] . Here we report direct measurement of dynamic charge stripes by inelastic neutron scattering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Much theoretical works has also been performed to study the behavior of the doped carriers in HTSC. Pioneering works adopting the Hartree-Fock approximation (HFA) have studied the stripe order in La 1.875 Ba 0.125 CuO 4 on the basis of the 2D one-band Hubbard model 20,21 or the 2D two-band Hubbard model. 22 Furthermore, dynamical mean field theory (DMFT) has been exploited to study the stripe phase on the basis of the 2D Hubbard model with L non-equivalent sites, where L = 8, .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%