Solubility of pyrene in binary (alkane + 2-butanol) solvent mixtures

Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data

2013

This work updates Vols. 54, 58, and 59 in the IUPAC Solubility Data Series and presents solubility data for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon solutes dissolved in binary organic solvent mixtures. Published solubility data for anthracene, naphthalene, phenanthrene, phenothiazine, and pyrene that appeared in the primary literature between 1995 to the end of 2011 are compiled and critically evaluated. Experimental solubility data for 360 different solute-binary solvent systems are included in the volume. Solubility data published prior to 1995 were contained in three earlier volumes (Vols. 54, 58, and 59) and are not repeated in this volume.

Section: Iupac-nist Solubility Data Series 98-1 013103-151mentioning

confidence: 99%

IUPAC-NIST Solubility Data Series. 98. Solubility of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Pure and Organic Solvent Mixtures: Revised and Updated. Part 1. Binary Solvent Mixtures

Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data

2013

“…[19][20][21][22] Examination of the numerical entries in Table 3 reveals that eq 3 predicts the solubility of pyrene to within an overall average absolute deviation of 1.6%, which is comparable to the experimental uncertainty of (1.5%. For the four systems studied, eq 3 was found to provide very accurate predictions of the observed solubility behavior.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 89%

“…Published papers [19][20][21] have reported the calculated S i parameters for pyrene dissolved in seven of the eight sub-binary solvent systems. Solubility data for the remaining binary solvent system were measured as part of the present study.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Solubility of Pyrene in Ternary Propanol + Butanol + 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane Solvent Mixtures at 299.15 K

Debase

2001

J. Chem. Eng. Data

Experimental solubilities are reported for pyrene dissolved in ternary 1-propanol + 1-butanol + 2,2,4-trimethylpentane, 2-propanol + 1-butanol + 2,2,4-trimethylpentane, 1-propanol + 2-butanol + 2,2,4-trimethylpentane, and 2-propanol + 2-butanol + 2,2,4-trimethylpentane solvent mixtures at 26°C and atmospheric pressure. Nineteen compositions were studied for each of the four solvent systems. Also measured were the solubilities of pyrene in binary 1-butanol + 2,2,4-trimethylpentane mixtures. Results of these measurements are used to test the predictive ability of the ternary solvent form of the Combined NIBS/Redlich-Kister equation. Computations showed that the model predicted the observed solubility behavior to within an overall average absolute deviation of ∼1.6%, which is comparable to the experimental uncertainty of (1.5%.

“…Deviations for the remaining six sub-binary solvent mixtures are published elsewhere. 19,20 Numerical values of the S i parameters have been given in Table 4 for convenience. Experimental mole fraction solubilities in 1-propanol (x A sat ) 0.00426), 2-propanol (x A sat ) 0.00290), 1-butanol (x A sat ) 0.00622), 2-butanol (x A sat ) 0.00439), 2-methyl-1-propanol (x A sat ) 0.00326), cyclohexane (x A sat ) 0.01100), and heptane (x A sat ) 0.01102) were also taken from the chemical literature.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Solubility of Pyrene in Ternary Alcohol + Cyclohexane + Heptane Solvent Mixtures at 299.15 K

and

2001

J. Chem. Eng. Data

Experimental solubilities are reported for pyrene dissolved in ternary 1-propanol + cyclohexane + heptane, 2-propanol + cyclohexane + heptane, 1-butanol + cyclohexane + heptane, 2-butanol + cyclohexane + heptane, and 2-methyl-1-propanol + cyclohexane + heptane solvent mixtures at 26°C and atmospheric pressure. Nineteen compositions were studied for each of the five solvent systems. Results of these measurements are used to test the predictive ability of the ternary solvent form of the combined NIMS/ Redlich-Kister equation. Computations showed that the model predicted the observed solubility behavior to within an overall average absolute deviation of ∼1.3%, which is comparable to the experimental uncertainty of (1.5%.