Cell-free DNA synthesis was performed in a lysed cell system from mouse cell cultures. The in vitro reaction was totally inhibited by N-ethylmaleimide but unaffected by hydroxyurea or fluorodeoxyuridine when these compounds were added to the incubation mixture. However, in a preparation obtained from cells which had been blocked by hydroxyurea before lysis, the rate of DNA synthesis was markedly reduced. This effect could not have been caused by the depletion of the precursor pools as all necessary triphosphates were added to the in vitro incubation mixture. Analysis by alkaline density gradients showed that the ligation of primary synthesis products is retarded in hydroxyurea-pretreated lysed cells and that small fragments accumulate. These results suggest that hydroxyurea interferes with the processing of early replication products, preventing the formation of longer intermediates. Its mechanism is either independent from the well-known inhibition of ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase or it may be the result of an as-yet-unknown function of this enzyme in a later step of replication. This observation could help to explain why cells appear to be blocked by hydroxyurea in the early part of the S phase (rather than at the Gl/S border proper) and also why DNA repair synthesis is relatively insensitive to the drug.Hydroxyurea (HU) is a specific inhibitor of DNA replication (34). It suppresses the polymerization of new strands almost completely and causes the accumulation of short DNA fragments that cannot be further elongated (16,21,24,25,29). Repair synthesis is much less affected by the drug (34). It has generally been assumed that the block of the conversion of ribonucleotides to deoxyribonucleotides via the inhibition of the enzyme ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase is responsible for these effects of HU (17,18,20). On the other hand, the difference in the response of replicative versus repair synthesis to HU is not obvious; the substrate affinities of the known DNA polymerases do not vary enough to provide a satisfactory rationale (4, 6). Moreover, the proposed mechanism cannot explain why HU-blocked cells do not stop at the Gl/S boundary but start replication and accumulate in the early S phase (10, 36).The observation that, in a cell-free DNAsynthesizing system obtained from HU-treated cells, the inhibition was still partly effective although all triphosphates were present in theincubation mixture led us to reconsider the effect of HU. This phenomenon was specific for HU and could not be observed with fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR), another substance which interferes with the precursor pool. Hence, it is unlikely that the observed lasting inhibition is due to the interference of HU with the biosynthesis of precursors. A more detailed investigation of this effect of HU is the subject of this report. (41) and grown in plastic petri dishes at 37°C in a water-saturated atmosphere with 7.5% C02, using DME medium containing 10% calf serum. After reaching confluence, cells stopped division, and they were usually us...