1977
DOI: 10.1139/o77-164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solubilization and partial purification of particulate catechol-O-methyltransferase from rat liver

Abstract: Particulate catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) from rat liver has been solubilized by acetone treatment and partially purified. Results from the present study demonstrate that the solubilized, partially purified enzyme is similar to the cytosol COMT with respect to molecular weight, pH profile, sensitivity toward inhibitors, Mg2+ requirement, and substrate affinities. However, a comparison of the crude particulate COMT and the solubilized enzyme shows that there is a significant difference in their affinity f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the results obtained in the present work do not allow us to suggest that younger rats are endowed with higher amounts of MB-COMT than older animals, this could be used as an explanation for the observation that O-methylation developing rats is more sensitive to inhibition by tolcapone. Another indication that would fit this suggestion is that Km values differ markedly between MB-COMT and S-COMT; according to Apprile & Malamud (1975) and Tong & d'Iorio (1977) 8.9 and in the liver by a factor of 3.9. Of course the preparations used in the experiments reported here probably constitute a mixture of MB-COMT and S-COMT, the ratio of which has to be determined in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though the results obtained in the present work do not allow us to suggest that younger rats are endowed with higher amounts of MB-COMT than older animals, this could be used as an explanation for the observation that O-methylation developing rats is more sensitive to inhibition by tolcapone. Another indication that would fit this suggestion is that Km values differ markedly between MB-COMT and S-COMT; according to Apprile & Malamud (1975) and Tong & d'Iorio (1977) 8.9 and in the liver by a factor of 3.9. Of course the preparations used in the experiments reported here probably constitute a mixture of MB-COMT and S-COMT, the ratio of which has to be determined in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Though the results obtained in the present work do not allow us to suggest that younger rats are endowed with higher amounts of MB-COMT than older animals, this could be used as an explanation for the observation that O-methylation developing rats is more sensitive to inhibition by tolcapone. Another indication that would fit this suggestion is that Km values differ markedly between MB-COMT and S-COMT; according to Apprile & Malamud (1975) and Tong & d'Iorio (1977) 12.4 (7.9, 16.9) 27.0 (4.9, 49.1) 24.8 (16.0, 33.5) 24.0 (11.7, 36.3) Values are arithmetic means +s.e.mean and geometric means with 95% confidence intervals of 5 experiments per group. Significantly different from Vmax values in 3 day old rats (*P<0.05) and significantly different from values in renal tissues ( §P<0.05) using the Newman-Keuls test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The soluble, cytoplasmic COMT (S-COMT) is responsible for the majority of enzyme activity in all tissues studied, whereas the membrane-bound or particulate COMT (MB-COMT) represents a minority of the overall COMT activity (Guldberg and Marsden, 1975;Kopin, 1986). The two enzymes have many properties in common (Jeffery and Roth, 1984), but differences also exist in the kinetic characteristics, particularly in the K, and in the position of the methylation of substrates (Aprille and Malamud, 1975;Nissinen, 1984;Tong and D'Iorio, 1977;Rivett et al, 1983). Cross-reactivity of S-and MB-COMT with polyclonal and monoclonal anti-COMT antisera has suggested structural similarity between the two enzyme forms (Grossmann et al, 1985;Bertocci et al, 1990;1991 a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we describe further studies on the use of the method in the large-scale preparation of catechol-0-methyl transferase and some properties of the purified enzyme. The previous method [5] has been improved by the use of a more stable ligand attached by a flexible 'spacer' arm to an agarose support.Various workers have suggested that catechol-0-methyl transferase may aggregate [6], possibly in the presence of membrane-derived material [7]. Experiments have been carried out on highly purified catechol-O-methyl transferase to investigate this possibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various workers have suggested that catechol-0-methyl transferase may aggregate [6], possibly in the presence of membrane-derived material [7]. Experiments have been carried out on highly purified catechol-O-methyl transferase to investigate this possibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%