1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf01190685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soluble groups which are products of nilpotent minimax groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More generally the first author proved in [1] that the same conclusion holds for soluble products G = AB of two nilpotent subgroups A and B with A =£ B, provided that one of them satisfies the maximum or minimum condition on subgroups. In fact a similar argument applies if one of the two factors A and B is minimax (see [5]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…More generally the first author proved in [1] that the same conclusion holds for soluble products G = AB of two nilpotent subgroups A and B with A =£ B, provided that one of them satisfies the maximum or minimum condition on subgroups. In fact a similar argument applies if one of the two factors A and B is minimax (see [5]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We begin by quoting a theorem of Zaicev. The first assertion is a slightly extended version of [10, Theorem 1] (see also [1,Lemma 2]), and the second assertion follows from the first on considering the split extension G = MxH, which is the product of its subgroups H and {h(hS):heH}.…”
Section: Corollary a And First Reductions For Theorem A'mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Condition (i) holds from step (c) above, condition (ii) since C M (D) is an F//-submodule and H acts faithfully on M. Condition (iii) holds by M(3.4)(a). By M(3.3) we have N = (S}S, where N is the <5>-module generated by N. If \H:<5>| is infinite we have r o ((S)) < r Q (H), so that Nis finite-dimensional; by (3,1) it follows that N = 0, so that DS = 0 and D ^ C H (M) = 1, and this is a contradiction. Therefore condition (iv) holds.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem A'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the final corollary we are able to give a surprisingly short proof, thereby avoiding quite heavy tools such as cohomology theory and splitting theorems for infinite groups (see [10] …”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%