2024
DOI: 10.1186/s13046-024-03074-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soluble immune checkpoints: implications for cancer prognosis and response to immune checkpoint therapy and conventional therapies

Stephanie C. Pitts,
Jeffrey Schlom,
Renee N. Donahue

Abstract: Longitudinal sampling of tumor tissue from patients with solid cancers, aside from melanoma and a few other cases, is often unfeasible, and thus may not capture the plasticity of interactions between the tumor and immune system under selective pressure of a given therapy. Peripheral blood analyses provide salient information about the human peripheral immunome while offering technical and practical advantages over traditional tumor biopsies, and should be utilized where possible alongside interrogation of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 246 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include sPD-L1, sPD1, sCTLA4, sCD80, sTIM3, sLAG3, sB7-H3, sBTLA and sHVEM. These checkpoints are generated by alternative splicing or proteolytic processes and play an important role in immune regulation, are involved in the development and prognosis of cancer and are considered potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets [ 32 ]. They are also ascribed similar functions to the membrane-bound forms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include sPD-L1, sPD1, sCTLA4, sCD80, sTIM3, sLAG3, sB7-H3, sBTLA and sHVEM. These checkpoints are generated by alternative splicing or proteolytic processes and play an important role in immune regulation, are involved in the development and prognosis of cancer and are considered potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets [ 32 ]. They are also ascribed similar functions to the membrane-bound forms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%