1997
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soluble Overexpression inEscherichia coli,and Purification and Characterization of Wild-Type Recombinant Tobacco Acetolactate Synthase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, MBP probably served as a suitable molecular chaperone that supported the proper folding of fp1 for soluble expression. In contrast, GST has failed to produce soluble fp1 although it has been reported to enable soluble expression of proteins that tend to form inclusion aggregates (Chang et al 1997). This is congruent with the studies by Kapust and Waugh (1999), which showed that MBP to be a better solubilizing agent than GST and TRX.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Hence, MBP probably served as a suitable molecular chaperone that supported the proper folding of fp1 for soluble expression. In contrast, GST has failed to produce soluble fp1 although it has been reported to enable soluble expression of proteins that tend to form inclusion aggregates (Chang et al 1997). This is congruent with the studies by Kapust and Waugh (1999), which showed that MBP to be a better solubilizing agent than GST and TRX.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Expression and purification of the recombinant AHAS was performed with modification as described by Chang et al [29]. Briefly, Escherichia coli DH5α cells containing the expression vector pGEX‐ALS were grown at 37°C in Luria–Bertani medium containing 50 μg/ml ampicillin to an OD 600 of 0.7–0.8.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the effects of these deletions on enzyme activity, we measured the enzyme activity under the standard saturating concentration of cofactors (1 mM ThDP, 20 µM FAD and 10 mM Mg 2+ ) and substrate (100 mM pyruvate) as reported previously [24,25] (Table 1). All of the deletions greatly reduced the activity to that of a few percent of wild-type enzyme, and deletion of the entire C-terminus ( 567), including both mobile loop and C-terminal lid, did not show any detectable activity.…”
Section: Construction and Expression Of C-terminal Truncated Tobacco mentioning
confidence: 99%