2020
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2020.1742151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solute inclusion and freezing rate during progressive freeze concentration of sucrose and maltodextrin solutions

Abstract: Progressive freeze concentration is an alternative method to concentrate aqueous industrial streams compared to evaporation or membrane separation. In this research sucrose and maltodextrin solutions were concentrated in a stirred progressive freeze concentrator. The solute inclusion in the formed ice was studied using varying stirring speeds, initial concentrations and freezing plate temperatures. Under constant freezing plate temperature, a lower limit was found for the solute inclusions with increasing stir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, eff and Y values decreased, indicating greater migration of the solutes onto the crystalline phase. The influence of temperature on ν¯ice has also been reported in previous works of freeze concentration systems (Moreno, Raventós, et al, 2014; Ojeda et al, 2017; Osorio et al, 2018; Vuist, Boom, & Schutyser, 2020). Some authors established that an average ice growth rate greater than 8 μm s −1 is very fast to achieve an effective separation of the concentrated phase (Moreno, Hernández, et al, 2014; Petzold, Orellana, Moreno, Cerda, & Parra, 2016).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In contrast, eff and Y values decreased, indicating greater migration of the solutes onto the crystalline phase. The influence of temperature on ν¯ice has also been reported in previous works of freeze concentration systems (Moreno, Raventós, et al, 2014; Ojeda et al, 2017; Osorio et al, 2018; Vuist, Boom, & Schutyser, 2020). Some authors established that an average ice growth rate greater than 8 μm s −1 is very fast to achieve an effective separation of the concentrated phase (Moreno, Hernández, et al, 2014; Petzold, Orellana, Moreno, Cerda, & Parra, 2016).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The occlusion also is affected by the type of ice: in FFFC is usual to find dendritic ice (Xu et al, 2022) ice crystal, the larger the liquid trapped in the channels, increasing the occlusion (Moreno et al, 2014a(Moreno et al, , 2015. However, impurities trapped at the nucleation phase could migrate away from the subcooled surface, in a process called elution (Scholz et al, 1993), due to the concentration difference between the layer close to the ice and the concentrated, which may lead to diffusion of solutes back into the liquid phase (Vuist et al, 2020). Finally, the occlusion mechanism will also depend on the type of solute, especially with low-molecularweight compounds, such as ethanol, due to the intense freezing point depression (Vuist et al, 2022).…”
Section: Freezing Temperature Effect (Tc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ū higher than 6000 ml min −1 would result in an insignificant increment in S and a significant decrement in W due to an intense liquid shear over the moving ice–liquid interface. 44…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ū higher than 6000 ml min −1 would result in an insignificant increment in S and a significant decrement in W due to an intense liquid shear over the moving iceliquid interface. 44 4.2 Effect of the initial concentration of the saltwater Fig. 5 and 6 show the effect of the initial concentration of saltwater (C l,o ) on the concentration of thawed ice (C s ) and the concentration of saltwater (C l ) at a saltwater circulation flow rate (Ū) = 5200 ml min −1 and a coolant temperature (T cool ) = −9 °C.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Efficacy Of The Processmentioning
confidence: 99%